Fans are completely shocked by the new toxicology report that reveals that Brittany Murphy may have actually poisoned. They have taken to Twitter to share their opinions on whether they think the young star was actually murdered.
On December 20, 2009, the world lost young actress, Brittany Murphy to natural causes. But her father, Angelo Bertolotti knew this wasn’t the truth and took it upon himself to get blood, tissue and hair samples tested. And the results, if true, will change everything — they show that she died with heavy metals in their systems.
Brittany Murphy Murdered? — Fans React On Twitter
It’s been nearly five years since the death of 32-year-old actress, and the fans are definitely not over it. The new lab results reveal that both she and her husband, Simon Monjack, could have been poisoned “by a third party.” Below are some reactions from fans:
How do you get a poison into someone? You put it something they willingly ingest, regularly, themselves (food, drugs, etc.) #brittanymurphy
— DJ Hematite (@dj_hematite) November 18, 2013
Surprise development in the Brittany Murphy case. Why was her body not tested for poison in the first place? http://t.co/NP9QiunxmR
— Michelle Buckeridge (@MichelleBuckers) November 18, 2013
Was Brittany Murphy Murdered? Forensic Tests Show Poison, Actress’ Dad Blames Someone With Criminal Intent For Death http://t.co/dK754PIQqC
— Amber James (@ajames08) November 18, 2013
dag Brittney Murphy got murdered :( — WAVERLY (@eyenowrite) November 18, 2013
CLUELESS ACTRESS BRITTANY MURPHY POISONED! WILL THERE BE A MURDER INVESTIGATION? http://t.co/bX94RBZt33
— NYCPRowler (@NYCPRowler) November 18, 2013
Brittany Murphy’s Death — New Lab Report Raises Questions
Are you still unsure about the new results? The Examiner obtained what The Carlson Company, the lab that did the testings Angelo asked for, came back with:
Ten (10) of the heavy metals evaluated were detected at levels higher that the WHO [The World Health Organization] high levels. Testing the hair strand sample identified as” back of the head” we have detected ten (10) heavy metals at levels above the WHO high levels recommendation. If we were to eliminate the possibility of a simultaneous accidental heavy metals exposure to the sample donor then the only logical explanation would be an exposure to these metals (toxins) administered by a third party perpetrator with likely criminal intent.
So, HollywoodLifers — are you shocked by these results? Do you think her death was from natural causes?
— Emily Longeretta