Ciara V. Kim Kardashian: Which 15-Carat Engagement Ring Do You Like?

Tue, October 29, 2013 11:53am EDT by 27 Comments 25,691 Article Views
Courtesy of Instagram/Splashnews/Getty

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

marshalls coro

Posted at 3:06 AM on January 25, 2014  

Poster seems to be bad mouthing ….name with held…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Hillsy

Posted at 12:44 AM on January 22, 2014  

This article is WRONG about diamond cut of Kim’s ring, and some of the people making comments need to learn basic math and how to read before they comment!

First to answer the actual question, I like Ciara’s better. Emerald-cut stones are my favorite and I like eternity bands with diamonds all around, not plain bands like Kim’s. But it’s all personal opinion. If Kim had an emerald-cut stone I’d prefer hers- especially if it had tiny baguette (or any other) diamonds all the way around the band.

Misinformed-
Kim K’s ring is NOT an emerald-cut diamond- As stated in the article, “…Matches Kim’s style perfectly. The ring features a flawless, emerald-cut diamond…” The diamond is obviously a cushion cut. I can see that just by looking at it, but to confirm I’ll see if I can find an article on the ring. I could see how it could be confused with a radiant-cut diamond maybe, but it doesn’t look anything like an emerald-cut. Ciara’s ring however IS composed of all emerald-cut diamonds.

Ciara’s ring is flawless too- @Becky “I’d take a 2 carat flawless ring over a 15 carat milky ring”… Read much?? BOTH rings are flawless “Future… presented the “Body Party” singer with a flawless, 15-carat diamond ring” and no diamonds depreciate in value over time unless you sell them to a pawnshop or something. Many stores sell “used” diamonds for the same price as new. How diamonds increase or decrease in value has to do with the economy, not size, unless it’s like the Hope Diamond!

8 + 2 1/2 + 2 1/2 does NOT equal 15, it equals 13- @Eli “Kim’s is better. The stone alone is 15 carats while Ciara’s is made up of three stones that equal up to 15.” Umm, no. “Her emerald-cut ring featured a flawless, eight carat diamond that was flanked by two 2 1/2 carat diamonds on each side, while the shank of the band was surrounded by emerald-cut diamonds.” That means there’s 13 carats between the main stone and 2 side stones, and 2 carats of other emerald-cut diamonds in the band. Try addition before you comment. P.S. the size of the diamond doesn’t decide if it’s “better”, it just means if it’s equal clarity as a smaller diamond then it’s worth more.

While Kim’s stone is bigger, they add up the the same diamond weight- @Kasey Long
“I thought Kim’s was big but Ciara’s is too big – too much bling” That doesn’t even begin to make sense. The rings have the same total weight of diamonds, but all Ciara’s diamonds are smaller (one 8 carat, two 2 1/2 carats, and several smaller diamonds) and Kim has one ridiculously huge 15 carat stone, and you think Ciara’s is too blingy?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Mike

Posted at 6:56 AM on February 18, 2014  

Oh my your so wrong. It’s clearly not a cushion cut either. Is oval for a start. Also there are diamonds all round the band. Also in the show Kanye said he wanted a smaller more flawless stone. It’s either flawless or not and seeing as he paid for it I recon he knows!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Cliffie

Posted at 3:54 PM on March 4, 2014  

That’s not a good picture of Ciara’s ring

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sean drew

Posted at 4:46 PM on December 28, 2013  

Why in the hell does anyone feel that (no matter how rich you are) they need to spend so much money on a damn ring??? 1-2 million dollars????? Such self serving narcissistic people!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Vannessa

Posted at 5:24 PM on October 30, 2013  

Kim you’ve had you’re thunder nothing surprises me more than Ciara’s engagement to sexy Future….and Future has amazing taste in wooing his love……Ciara”s ring was beautifully designed and speaks louder than words…..once again Ciara congrats…n I cannot forget congrats to you as well Kimye may your union be everlasting

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Candere Diamonds

Posted at 6:23 AM on October 30, 2013  

It is difficult to decide that which ring looks more attractive than other because both looks beautiful just like Kim and Ciara. I am confused between both rings but personally i like Kim ring.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nolo

Posted at 3:55 AM on October 30, 2013  

I’m not a big fan of Kim but again it was that arrogant husband to be who choose the ring, is in your face yet is beautiful, is not making noise like Ciara’s and the last one Kim had.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Vannessa

Posted at 5:25 PM on October 30, 2013  

I agree

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lows

Posted at 1:05 AM on October 30, 2013  

Ciara! @Becky next time you read the headlines carefully, it say compare rings not personal vandata, suggest you change your brain,

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

profit555wer

Posted at 9:31 PM on October 29, 2013  

Love sees no color. Don’t you think black and white is a beautiful combinations? Just GO TO~~~ ( MixédPartner.c0m ) ~ Successful online dating site..Over 1700000 active members from local and worldwide. Join us to have a special mixed relationship.sdaaae2

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sheckwzd6556

Posted at 9:30 PM on October 29, 2013  

.Are you still single ? You are not alone. Free join~~~MixedLuv.Çom~~ Millions of singles have joined it.. This is a Serious interracial dating site for black and white singles seeking relationships, friendships, dating ,love and more. Single black people meeting single white people is why we are here.With the background verification system, you can easily find someone real, serious, quality. Have a try.5555555

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

joannejgarner (@joannejgarner)

Posted at 7:16 PM on October 29, 2013  

my buddy’s sister makes $97 an hour on the computer. She has been unemployed for nine months but last month her payment was $16413 just working on the computer for a few hours. try here—->>> Jobs25.­­ℭ­­Oℳ

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Leez pwky

Posted at 6:02 PM on October 29, 2013  

Ciara princess Harris look better

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Shelly

Posted at 3:50 PM on October 29, 2013  

Ciara’s ring looks a lot better than Kim’s.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Danielle

Posted at 6:27 PM on October 29, 2013  

It’s honestly all a matter of personal opinion. While Ciara’s ring is gaudier & has a little more wow-factor, I think the shape of Kim’s is much prettier. But that’s just because I prefer the rounded edges and the thinness of the band rather than the square/rectangular shape of Ciara’s.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kasey Long

Posted at 11:17 PM on October 29, 2013  

I thought Kim’s was big but Ciara’s is too big – too much bling

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

pawsomebearvillehelp

Posted at 2:44 PM on October 29, 2013  

I though you weren’t suppose to propose on their birthday…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jil

Posted at 2:43 PM on October 29, 2013  

Um, you people are so self absorbed. The question was who’s do you like better not which carat amount do you like more

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

me

Posted at 1:43 PM on October 29, 2013  

Well 66 percent like Ciara’s it must be because it looks better because Kim’s ring looks small for 15 carats.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Susan

Posted at 1:29 PM on October 29, 2013  

Why would Ciara want to marry him? He has 3 kids with different woman. Gross!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Vannessa

Posted at 5:41 PM on October 30, 2013  

every1 deserves 2 b happy after failed attempts…just because Future has 3CHILDREN with DIFFERENT WOMEN doesn’t mean that he doesn’t deserve 2 settle down and b happy….I commend Ciara for not judging and finding her love……even if it comes with special luggage….. children r a special luggage n it takes sum1 special 2 embrace that………

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Becky

Posted at 1:24 PM on October 29, 2013  

Kim has the better ring. Kim’s ring is 15 carats flawless. Kim’s ring is worth 5 million. Ciara’s ring doesn’t compare. I would take a 2 carat flawless ring over a 15 carat milky ring. Ciara’s ring wouldn’t hold its value. Kim’s ring value will increase rapidly because it’s 1 solid flawless stone.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Bernard Walker

Posted at 1:09 PM on October 29, 2013  

let me see . I get my girl one of these 15 carat thingees and we have a 3 way !!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Eli

Posted at 12:33 PM on October 29, 2013  

I would say Kim’s is better. The stone alone is 15 carats while Ciara’s is made up of three stones that equal up to 15.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sar

Posted at 8:33 PM on October 30, 2013  

Yesssssssssssss!!!!! 1 whole 15 ct. stone is worth more than 3. Point blank……Kim’s is better.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

abe

Posted at 11:59 AM on October 29, 2013  

15-Carat? hahahahahahahahahahaha, americans likkanyeeeeew is to poor to buy this.
…………….BET?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter