Mary Queen Of Scots: ‘Reign’ Stars Separate Historical Fact From Fiction

Fri, October 18, 2013 10:54am EDT by 92 Comments 11,591 Article Views
Mary Queen Of Scots
Courtesy of The CW

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

Michelle Weese

Posted at 4:04 PM on September 25, 2014  

I like the show, but would like some true accents, not all English!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Dust Mites Rash

Posted at 2:45 AM on August 26, 2014  

Hi, of course this article is truly good and I have learned lot of
things from it about blogging. thanks.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Howard

Posted at 2:10 AM on July 28, 2014  

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but
I find this topic to be actually something that I think I would
never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me.
I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of
it!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lillian

Posted at 5:48 AM on July 27, 2014  

Hello, for all time i used to check weblog posts here
in the early hours in the dawn, as i enjoy to gain knowledge
of more and more.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

pull ralph lauren pas cher

Posted at 2:20 AM on July 20, 2014  

"Je ne suis pas htrosexuel et c'est une chose que j'ai pu avouer mes proches que trs rcemment, au cours des deux dernires semaines." Le nageur australien Ian Thorpe, vritable lgende de la natation mondiale avec cinq titres de champion olympique et onze de champion du monde, rvle son homosexualit dans une interview diffuse dimanche 13 juillet par la cha?ne Channel Ten, et dont un extrait est publi dans sur le site du Daily Telegraph (en anglais). Cette rvlation intervient aprs des annes de rumeurs, toujours dmenties par le champion australien, ag de 31 ans. Ainsi, en 2012, dans son autobiographie intitule This is Me, "Thorpedo" (son surnom) avait affirm ne pas tre homosexuel. "Je ne suis pas gay (..) et suis attir par les femmes, j'aime les enfants et je compte bien crer un jour une famille", avait-il crit. "La plus grande avance pour la reconnaissance des homosexuels en Australie"Selon le Sunday Telegraph, Ian Thorpe explique dans cette interview qu'il a d? batailler longtemps contre la dpression avant de se dcider parler de son homosexualit. En fvrier, le champion avait t hospitalis aprs avoir ingr un cocktail de mdicaments. Des tmoignages de soutien et de sympathie ont immdiatement afflu. "'Thorpie' est et sera toujours une superstar mes yeux", a ainsi tweet sa compatriote Stephanie Rice, championne olympique Pkin.Thorpie is and will always be a superstar in my eyes!!! @IanThorpe Stephanie Rice (@ItsStephRice) July 12, 2014Le plongeur australien Matthew Mitcham, lui aussi champion Pkin, a lui dclar qu'il pouvait "parfaitement comprendre combien cela a t difficile" pour Ian Thorpe de rvler son homosexualit. Lui-mme avait fait son coming-out en 2008. Pour un journaliste du Sunday Telegraph, ce coming-out constitue surtout "la plus grande avance pour la reconnaissance des homosexuels en Australie". In all (…) Lire la suite sur Francetv infoCoupe du monde : le Fran?ais Paul Pogba lu meilleur jeune joueurLa fabuleuse histoire du trophe de la Coupe du monde, qui a chapp aux nazis, mais pas aux voleursLa presse allemande clbre G?tze, un "Dieu du football"L'Allemagne bat l'Argentine aprs prolongation (1-0) et remporte la Coupe du mondeCoupe du monde : le tableau des rsultats en un clin d'?il

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

google authorship code

Posted at 5:38 AM on July 10, 2014  

There’s certainly a lot to know about this subject.
I love all of the points you’ve made.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sherrie

Posted at 12:13 AM on June 3, 2014  

When I first saw reign, I was captivated by the gowns and basic clothing. I love castles and do wish it could be a little more historical as far as what was happening in Ireland and scotland. I learned
About a lot of the history in school but the relationships and drama do make reign more interesting.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sherry

Posted at 7:36 PM on May 8, 2014  

This is ludicrous….the comments I have read. Its a show not a documentary. If it was strictly factual it wouldnt be fun to watch it would suck. I happen to love the show. Merlin, king Arthur, the white queen. thats to name a few had some facts but to make it interesting added things. So what….. who cares. I hope they can make several seasons out of this show cause I absolutely love it……..thank you CW

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jlc

Posted at 11:19 PM on March 21, 2014  

I am fairly certain that she marries both Francis and Bash. Francis first, then when he dies Bash.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John Tabinsky in Phoenix

Posted at 1:28 AM on April 18, 2014  

Mary couldn’t have married Bash because he didn’t exist in real life. He’s a totally made up character.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

violeteubank

Posted at 7:59 PM on October 22, 2014  

In truth Henry and Diane had no illegitimate children let alone Bash. HenryII had three illegitimate children, Catherine gave him 8 children Diane had two by her husband. None of these were named Sebastian or Bash. and Henry’s illegitimate children were by other women not Diane, Diane was a mother figure to Henry who married Catherine when they were both 14; Diane was more like 35 when they started their affair, he 15. But that would not appeal to the younger generation today.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sharryn Fitzpatrick

Posted at 4:38 AM on March 14, 2014  

i like that it strays from history as it would make a boring story otherwise. So please stray on.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kenn Olson

Posted at 5:59 PM on March 5, 2014  

It doesn’t bug me that Reign takes some creative approaches to telling Mary’s story. I don’t know many of the details of my grandfather’s life, let alone my grandfathers before him, they could have had illegitimate brothers or sons and disfigured children living in the walls. History is fraught with ambiguity and if it makes it more entertaining to embellish it with subplots, good looking actors and more interesting wardrobes, go for it, as long as the core historical facts are respected. Nowadays people Google for the straight dope, and if it takes entertainment to want us to know the facts, so be it.

History, as much as many of us find it boring, teaches us many lessons, and is important to the future, and I am glad that there is an interest in things historical. It has been said that ‘real life is stranger’ and often more interesting ‘than fiction;’ it’s possible that if the writers had poked around in the libraries and vaults of Europe they’d have found even more interesting historical truths. For now, long live Reign.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

tif

Posted at 3:01 PM on March 2, 2014  

YESSS Love the creative liberties they are taking, otherwise it would be a really sad and depressing series. Though I LOVE Mary and Francis and I’m so happy they will ultimately get married. Please writers, just let them be in love and happy for a while. Bash and Mary have had more time together than Francis and Mary have… Can’t wait for Francis to come back to the show, it’s so dreary without him, he really adds something important to it

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Diana

Posted at 5:12 PM on February 25, 2014  

It should have historical liberties!! How many teenage girls do you know who are obsessed with history?? These liberties make the series more enjoyable. Im not saying they should change everything though. I like the fact that this show has history and in a way is educational but it is also creative and entertaining.
I would like mary to wed bash!! Sad to hear she will wed francis instead. Ohh well, he.is hot too.
LOVE REIGN!!!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Vanessa

Posted at 9:56 AM on March 4, 2014  

I know im sad too maybe they can have them marry in a not legal kind a way..😃

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

suzy

Posted at 4:48 PM on February 25, 2014  

I am so dissapointed to read that mary is going to wed francis and not sebastian.
I love fantasy history. It history but way more interesting. I am all for historical liberties :)

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Spark

Posted at 6:51 PM on February 19, 2014  

I like d series and am glad its not all totally accurate,but it will make more sense with mary and francis coming back 2geda wit d same amount of love they had at d beginning of d season! Both mary and francis fits perfectly well,so plz make their reunion perfect

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jsw

Posted at 5:18 PM on February 10, 2014  

ok so its historically wrong and bash didn’t exist…..but what gets me is EVERYONE who knows anything about Mary Queen of Scots knows she was known for her read hair even the day she was executed she wore a red wig. She was interesting enough to make a real show about.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kate

Posted at 11:03 PM on February 6, 2014  

I would have preferred they were accurtate. However, if they are going to stray from history – they may as well run with it and have Mary wed Sebastian. I’m disappointed to read that she won’t.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kate

Posted at 11:04 PM on February 6, 2014  

*Accurate. It would be nice if I could have accurate spelling if I’m going to ask someone else for accuracy.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Casluvskir

Posted at 7:43 AM on February 8, 2014  

I agree with everything you wrote! Accurate!! But people make mistakes and spell check too, maybe… :) I really would like to see this show to be based on historical facts and not a remake on what they think society would prefer. It’s a shame really…for those out there who do not know much about the “real” Mary, this is very misleading..but to the younger generation…if you like this show, go and read a book on the real Queen Mary! Very interesting! That being said, I do enjoy the show…fantasy and all. Henry the eighth is a fantastic study as well! Anyone agree??

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Amanda

Posted at 2:31 PM on February 4, 2014  

I was so excited when I saw this show was going to be on and each episode has disappointed me more and more. Its become more and more ridiculous and moving farther and farther away from History and historical facts from how a queen and princess would have acted to clothing to the story itself. Its just disappointing I had such high hopes for this show since I love This part of History

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sharryn Fitzpatrick

Posted at 4:43 AM on March 14, 2014  

Go and read a history book then

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John Tabinsky in Phoenix

Posted at 1:32 AM on April 18, 2014  

idiotic reply

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sally Springer

Posted at 5:51 PM on January 31, 2014  

As a Scot born and brought up in Edinburgh I was excited when I saw the prospect of seeing on TV a fairly accurate attempt at true Scottish history and so disappointed to find out it was just Hollywood hype. That time in history didn’t need any pretense or inaccuracy. It should have given Americans of Scottish heritage a realist approach to what life in Scotland was like in the 16th century.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

nonickname

Posted at 8:45 PM on February 2, 2014  

as much as I love history I appreciate the fact that they are straying away from the facts and coming up with “fantasy history” because the truth about how Mary Queen of Scots was treated through her whole life would make a very depressing show. especially the 18 years in captivity. If you want to watch a historically accurate show about Mary and Scotland then watch this history channel.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kendra

Posted at 11:34 AM on January 30, 2014  

I love Reign! It’s amazing!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

bouges13

Posted at 2:34 PM on January 24, 2014  

It’s times like these that I am happy to have failed to study history as closely as I could/should have… I can watch historical dramas and have no idea what is going to happen while having a vague knowledge of who the characters are. It’s kind of nice, and if the story really captures my attention I am motivated to learn more of the subject.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lyndsy Shepherd

Posted at 3:28 AM on December 29, 2013  

I wish It was more accurate, I like learning… but still entertaining.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Cori

Posted at 3:40 PM on December 28, 2013  

Totally love the show. However, It’s tough for me to get use to the non period costuming and the imaginative re-creation of a real history. So does this mean Mary doesn’t get be-headed? Or will this be the finalee?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ramsha

Posted at 6:00 AM on December 19, 2013  

im so HAPPY its not following history. i dont want francis to die!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jmt

Posted at 3:54 PM on December 16, 2013  

CORRECTION _ suffered brain fade – Catherine de’Medici was married to Henry (Catherine of Aragon was an English queen) Sorry

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,929 other followers