Linda Evangelista's Baby Daddy Spent Thousands On Self, But Forgot Son's Birthday Gift

Sat, May 5, 2012 12:24pm EST by 12 Comments
Linda Evangelista Baby

Linda Evangelista continued her battle for child support from her billionaire ex-boyfriend, Francois-Henri Pinault, during their second day in Manhattan Family Court. Do you think she’ll get $46,000 a month?

Linda Evangelista and her French billionaire baby daddy, Francois-Henri Pinault, met face to face for the second day of their child support settlement battle in Manhattan Family Court, where disturbing new facts about Francois-Henri’s relationship with his now five-year-old son, Augustin, were revealed.

It turns out, Francois-Henri spent $260,000 (euros) on gifts in 2010, but didn’t even remember what he bough “Augie” for his fourth birthday and couldn’t recall how much he spent on him for Christmas. “I bought it online,” he said of the gift. “It was a piano thing.”

Additionally, he didn’t give his son gifts until Linda complained.

Linda, who became pregnant with Augie after dating Francois-Henri for four months, is asking that her son’s treatment be in keeping with Francois-Henri other child — Valentina, his daughter with wife Salma Hayek. Linda’s lawyer pointed out that Valentina has a $12 million L.A. home in a trust.

Also, it was revealed that Linda held off on any child support legalities when Salma and Francois-Henri were scared Valentina would be born with Down Syndrome.

“We were told the baby had Down Syndrome until late May 2007,’ Francois-Henri said. “I asked Linda to delay the legal recognition process [of son Augustin] until after the birth of Valentina.”

In addition to recognizing Linda is an excellent mother to their son, Francois-Henri also acknowledged how thankful he was to Linda for waiting on Valentina’s birth.

Later in the proceedings, Linda discussed her employment history, which demonstrated she’s not afraid to work, and also pointed out she’s not nearly in demand as a model as she used to be — which is one reason her son needs $46,000 a month.

Do YOU think Francois-Henri should pay up, or is Linda being ridiculous? Sound off below!


More Linda Evangelista News:

  1. Salma Hayek’s Billionaire Husband Opens Up About His Love Child With Linda Evangelista — He Insists He’s A Good Dad!
  2. Supermodel Linda Evangelista Demands $46K A Month In Child Support From Salma Hayek’s Hubby, Francois-Henri Pinault!
  3. Salma Hayek’s Billionaire Husband Fathered A Love Child With Supermodel Linda Evangelista!

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

best baby jogger double stroller

Posted at 10:43 AM on June 3, 2012  

I do accept as true with all of the ideas you have offered for your post. They’re very convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are too brief for beginners. May just you please lengthen them a bit from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 5:03 AM on May 7, 2012  

Linda Evangelista wouldnt have carried that child to term if his dad was just some Joe Schmoe. Sounds to me like she purposely got pregnant to be in a bilionaire’s pocket, from what ive read about the court proxeedibgs, of the 4 months they dated, they were physically together for only 7 days…. She purposely got pregnant to have a stake in Mr. Pinaults fortune. As a single mother of twin boys, my childrens father, just as Mr. Pinault did, left when I refused to abort. However, I had his parental rights terminated as to not hurt my sons by having drawn out court battles with someone who doesnt love them. Poor Augustin.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 1:29 PM on May 9, 2012  

They were together 4 months & had sex 7 times. Guys expect the women to “take care of” the birth control part. Too bad…you play you pay ahahahahaha. He gets what he deserves.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Gizmo Bro

Posted at 4:17 PM on May 6, 2012  

I’m extremely inspired with your writing talents and also with the layout to your blog. Is that this a paid topic or did you customize it your self? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it’s uncommon to look a great weblog like this one these days..

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 6:52 PM on May 5, 2012  

This billionaire just wanyts to sleep around with beautidful women, now that he got her impregnated he insisted on having the child aborted coz he is so greedy and doesn’t want to give any support.

He should pay more vfor trying to kill his own son.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 6:07 PM on May 5, 2012  

OK, $46K/month for 18 years comes up around $10 million. For a billionaire like him this is pocket change. I don’t understand why he is going to court on this. It’s his son. He should pay more.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Steve S.

Posted at 11:18 AM on May 7, 2012  

Parev, agree with you.

It’s his child. Absent someone putting a gun to his head, it was his choice to engage in activities that can lead to procreation. Did she get pregnant on purpose? I don’t know.

Your math is valid as well. I would also point out that $46K per month in 18 years won’t be the same as $46K per month now, so, in a very real financial sense he is getting off even easier than if he paid her a lump sum of $9-$10 million right now.

If I were him, I would tell my accountant to send a check for that amount each month for 18 years and get on with life, since it appears he does not care for being much of a father to that child.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 6:05 PM on May 5, 2012  

Linda probably thought she hit the jackpot when she got pregnant with his child. 46,000 thousand is ridiculous.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 2:32 PM on May 5, 2012  

Both of these parents are to blame. It’s like when Mel Gibson was fighting his Ex in court and they kept shoving the baby out in front, using the baby as nothing more then a pawn in their selfish, childish public bickering. Of course he owes child support, but not the insane amount of money she is demanding. She is attempting to gain spousal support and using the child as an excuse. They are both idiots. If I were him, there’s no way I would give into those demands. No man would. They are completely outrageous. I don’t think he should be judged for that. For some of his other behavior, that’s a different story.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 2:10 PM on May 5, 2012  

He should pay and should equally love unconditionally both his children. Whatever problem he had with his baby mama, got nothing to do with the son. Can you imagine if-if his daughter has down syndrome? What then?
So yes, he should lavish both children. That poor boy must think his father don’t love him.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 1:02 PM on May 6, 2012  

His father *doesn’t* love him.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 2:54 PM on May 9, 2012  

The fact is you have to pay child support according to your financial worth!!whats wrong with that? This is for every income bracket..this is your child and if your obligated to pay that means your not the custodial parent and you dont deal with 24hr a day routine of raising the child.Whats wrong with someone who doesnt want to provide the very best of whatever they have for their kid??Russell Simmons an Kimmora divorced and he Agreed not ordered to pay $60000mo for child support for his children and He proud about being able to provide nothing but the best for his kids and he’s no Selma husband should of been wrapping it up if he only wanted to dote and by lavish gifts for his daughter;-)

Share this comment at Share with Twitter