Posted Tue, February 22, 2011 10:55am EDT

Rachel Zoe Has The Smallest 9-Month Bump Ever, Right?!

Posted Tue, February 22, 2011 10:55am EDT

The celebrity stylist is due to give birth to a baby boy within the next few weeks! Is it just us, or is that one TEENY-TINY baby bump??

Rachel Zoe, 39, has always been super-skinny, but is it safe for her to be expecting a baby at such a low weight? Look at Natalie Portman — she’s reportedly due this spring and has a very healthy baby belly. Rachel, you are too tiny!

Rachel tells her baby-to-be to stay put until after the Oscars!

In the past, Rachel has admitted that food isn’t a number one priority for her. Sometimes it could be 7:00 pm and all she has had is a “coffee and a grapefruit.” She told Us Weekly in 2008, “it’s not that I don’t eat,” saying that lunch isn’t her thing. “I’m not a lady who lunches; it’s a lull in the day.” How does her husband Rodger Berman feel about this?

We just hope her thoughts about eating have changed since her pregnancy started. She looks too thin to be pushing 9 months pregnant.

–Leigh Blickley

Get more HollyBaby news and gossip! Friend us on Facebook, Follow us on Twitter and Subscribe to our Newsletter!

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

tee

Posted at 6:59 AM on May 5, 2011  

Watevr! D article z ryt. She lukz lyk shz 5mnths preggrz. It lukz 2 small in my opinion.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

mimi tholsted

Posted at 1:18 PM on April 2, 2011  

OMG what nonsens some of you writes…….and Sophia Loren ????? Rachel Zoe is and have always been a tiny woman, but look who is laughing now?????…in the Asian communety how small the women are …and they make babies…..you dont have to look like a whale to look pregnant and having a healthy pregnancy and baby…..snap out of it guys!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Courtney

Posted at 11:39 PM on February 22, 2011  

Nicole Kidman hardly showed because she’s nearly 6ft tall and tall women distribute pregnancy weight differently than short people do Rachel’s probably about 5’6″ barefoot so she’s gonna look bigger even with minimal weight gain than someone like Adriana Lima or Sophie Dahl both of whom like Kidman are nearly 6ft tall. granted Dahl wasn’t Sophie’s last name at birth she took it at 18 when she became a model nor was her firstname at birth Sophie it was Sophia which is her mother Tessa’s given middle name her last name was Holloway. nor is this Rachel’s first pregnancy only her first successful one she’s miscarried at least once before

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cupcake

Posted at 4:16 PM on February 22, 2011  

she is a fashion stylist, im sure she is going to hide it as much as possible, she knows how to dress, im sure thats part of why she still looks tiny!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Cydney

Posted at 1:59 AM on February 23, 2011  

Thank you! At least I know I’m not the only one thinking this.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Non of your concern

Posted at 1:29 PM on February 22, 2011  

I can’t believe this article. I’m sure that she has a doctor and if she’s come this far she is FINE. Look at Kidman, she didn’t show at all during her pregnancy. Just because someone has a small bump doesn’t mean that there is anything wrong.

Hollybaby should be ashamed to publish such crap.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Courtney

Posted at 12:22 PM on February 22, 2011  

please no it’s not their pointing out hat the baby will probably be underweight and have many medical issues because their mother was irresponsible during her pregnancy. people like Rachel shouldn’t be allowed to reproduce it’s one thing if you were born or raised in a war wridden country like Sophia Loren was in Italy at 5’8″ tall because of food rashioning during the war she only weighed 115 when not expecting a child & miscarried her first two pregnancies in the mid second trimester so she had to be on bed rest for the duration of the following two that produced her beloved sons Carlo Jr & Edoardo Ponti. Rachel has no Excuse for this at least some actual celebs gain the resonsible amount of weight or a bit more during pregnancy. for example Amy Adams admitted to gaining 40lbs while she was pregnant with her daughter of course Rachel is slightly taller than Amy and height changes how you distribute pregnancy weight gain

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Doctor

Posted at 11:47 AM on February 22, 2011  

What does a “healthy baby belly” look like?
Do you know her actual weight? Prior to pregnancy? Currently?

Are you her ob/gyn?

What an irresponsible article.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

john

Posted at 10:15 PM on February 22, 2011  

Thank you!
You said it better than i could have!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,886 other followers