Usher’s Son ‘Doing Fine’ After Nearly Drowning In Pool

Wed, August 7, 2013 5:52pm EDT by 11 Comments
Usher's Son Drowning
SplashNews

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

Kim

Posted at 4:16 AM on August 8, 2013  

This woman shouldn’t have custody over any child!!! Leaving them swimming with a adult babysitter is not a crime nor creating a dangerous environment!! This is an accident, nothing more, nothing less and it could have happened on anybody’s watch. She had her own son killed by letting him jetski at the age of 11, that was a true dangerous situation! The crazy woman should be thankfull for the quick and accurate reaction of everybody present at this incident, she was probably wat hing these kods very closely wich prevented drowning. It’s not like she wasn’t near that pool or anything. No father can be present 24/7 and she should zip it, especially given that her desicions díd kill a child earlier!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kim

Posted at 6:12 PM on August 8, 2013  

one Kim to another Kim…….. you took those words directly from my mouth….and OH how true it is!!!!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Loopy

Posted at 9:43 PM on August 7, 2013  

Put the kid up for adoption, neither parent is responsible
Did not see any pix that he was even at his step son’s funeral, according to the press
You need to be there when you are a parent.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Pia Razon

Posted at 9:20 PM on August 7, 2013  

Tameka created this entire custody dispute by depriving Usher of seeing his sons out of spite. That led him to seek full custody, which he was awarded. Now having said that, there is no reason a sister or nanny should see a child more than a mother who is loving and willing to care for her own children. She pushed him into a corner which caused him to fight, but now he needs to be the bigger person and they both need to figure out how to co-parent. A mother should not have to sit back and let third parties raise her child when she is able and willing to do so. That is just wrong. If the judge does allows a more equitable custody arrangement, I hope she stops being so damn evil and vindictive, and focuses solely on raising those boys. BTW, Usher should not be blamed for this terrible accident!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Trisha Stone

Posted at 8:41 PM on August 7, 2013  

Give this Man and his Family some RESPECT and not Judge the Situation as U would not want to be Judge….

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Ms

Posted at 8:08 PM on August 7, 2013  

I think if he knows his schedule he should work something with her where whenever hes out of town she should stay with her children not someone else besides their mother. He is not a single parent because its obvious she want to be with her children And Raised them. She should have as much time with them as he does even though clearly hes not spending enough. So what if he has to work And be out of town thats WHY there 2 parents so that the other can be with them when they cant.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lucille7777

Posted at 6:32 PM on August 7, 2013  

Usher bought that custody verdict and now that Judge Lane has stepped down for misconduct in Usher/Tameka Raymond’s case and 9 other cases too, those children should have been returned to Tameka Raymond a long time ago. Below is a link to the Judge Lane case and her misconduct and corruption, and the effort to get her removed from the bench altogether. Even the FBI has gotten involved.

Even though Judge Lane was conducting corrupt business as usual, even she dare not say that Tameka Raymond was unfit. I read the decision and she starts saying she will discuss the reason why she is giving the children to Usher and then proceeds not to do so, rather she goes in to detail what rights Tameka Raymond still has but in the following pages, she takes all of those rights away.

Judge Lane had already denied Tameka Raymond a new trail but after the Judge’s resignation, it was reported a new trial had been scheduled. In any case the children need their mother not “help” or “aunts.” Usher’s ego is well out of control.

By the way the child of Tameka’s that died, was visiting his father, Tameka’s ex-husband, so of course she wasn’t there when the boating accident happened so that’s not her fault and he was a pre-teen not a little 5 year old. The driver of the boat has been criminally charged.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Honeydew

Posted at 7:16 PM on August 7, 2013  

What ego Usher has? He can’t be around his kids all day long he has to work to make money. I have children myself and I leave them with thier aunt so I can provide for them, so I don’t deserve them bc I leave them with “the help”? Do you even know how it feel to be a single parent and having to find someone to watch your children while you work? This man deserves his children as much as she do!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Pia Razon

Posted at 9:25 PM on August 7, 2013  

Honeydew, we commend you for being a single parent and yes, it is incredibly tough to find help for the children while you have to work too. But, in this case, there is a mother who is available, able and willing to care for her own children while Usher works. There is absolutely no reason to deprive her of that. There has never been any allegations that she has harmed her children in any way. No sister or nanny can replace a mother’s love. Although she started this by being vindictive, they now need to stop the nonsense and work together. She should never deprive Usher of seeing his sons. She needs to have first right when Usher is working to care for her sons.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Liz

Posted at 6:15 PM on August 7, 2013  

I think Usher should keep custody This could of happen to anybody .

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Loopy

Posted at 10:05 PM on August 7, 2013  

Get on the Internet, it is imperative that these drains are covered. I think Usher can afford a fifty dollar dome for residential pools.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,601 other followers