Kate Middleton’s 11-Hour Delivery With No Painkillers Revealed

Mon, July 29, 2013 9:52am EST by 29 Comments
Kate Middleton Labor Details
Getty

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

royalsareajoke

Posted at 6:57 PM on November 29, 2013  

I don’t believe that she had 11 hours of hard labor…in fact how many first time mothers look so chipper after having all that supposed pain and hard work…as far as pain killers…who knows what went into the iv if indeed this is truly not a baby born of a surrogate….interesting that wills and waity have such a huge protection detail yet here they are with the infant out posing for pix…not to mention all the hand shaking…and then when they took maybe new mum and baby AND wills to mummy’s house there were helicopters and guards….if someone wanted to take the time and effort to harm this amusing pair of self absorbed dolts it wouldn’t be all that difficult…and this pix is about her..waity…had her hair done…special dress made….c’mon ….I think that if this were truly the offspring of wk she would be a whole lot more protective and worry less about her appearance and wave….also, with the big deal about this little baby I believe that a C-Section would be performed to guarantee a safe delivery…no chances taken…after 11 hours….not buying it…the surrogacy rumors are out there….not quite a firestorm yet but haven’t seen much of that baby except at his christening when he looked like a girl in the ‘traditional’ gown (remade) …but, wait….that can’t be….waity and wills are just like us…never would they have had such a small (snobby elite) group at what should be a very well attended occasion (and not chosen a more modern and masculine attire for the little dude)…after all a christening is welcoming a child and promising to guide it in the right direction….the more people there the better, no? And that belly looks too perfectly round….yes, we have baby bellies after birth but flabby…and other messy things are going on as well…don’t tell me that waity wore ****gasp**** undies…not buying this…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ldyst

Posted at 10:16 PM on August 22, 2013  

I don’t believe she had four midwives, they value their privacy so much I just don’t see that. Who would need four anyway. ridiculous!!! I’m betting she had some pain meds through IV.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Elizabeth

Posted at 3:35 PM on August 3, 2013  

It is sad that you judge people the way you do. I’m sure you would cringe and be hurt at the nastiness being spewed forth in this colum. Walk in someone’s shoes sand you MIGHT understand them a little better. But from what I’ve read, the small mindedness, and unGodlike attitudes of those who quickly condems a persons actions, tells me that you don’t look in the mirror with the same mentality.
Leave the couple alone if you cannot be happy for them. Hell they are new parents. They are going to make mistakes. Didn’t you? Congratulation William and Kate. Rmember to lean on the Lord, your family, and ignore people who are jelous and like to call people names. Obviously they are immature, jealous of the attention you receive, and are small minded fools that shame the Country.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

royalsareajoke

Posted at 7:06 PM on November 29, 2013  

Don’t you mean walk in her wedgies and why is it that people who don’t buy into the crap being sold as roses…those who don’t fawn over wills and waity simply have to be jealous…default reason…always…apropos I suppose since wk is a default bride. There’s a lot more evidence to support that than there is that people are jealous….they are simply seeing thru the pr created happy sappy stuff to the real deal….for God’s sake….a 31 year old woman who has access to a palace (and damned well should have given birth in one even an ad hoc…..to all but shut down an entire hospital for this is unconscionable ) and servants runs home to mummy….at horrendously useless expense…no, people do have reasons to hold these people in utter contempt!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

eileen stevens

Posted at 9:39 AM on August 3, 2013  

Why is this such a big deal? 11 hrs. is actually short for a first birth, which is average of 20 hrs. for the total labor. But are they including the entire labor in this number? Some people only count hard labor. My first was 22 hrs. total but the second was only 4 hrs, total. The last baby was 6 and a half hrs. total. I had all of them at home with midwives which means of course, no drugs. Too dangerous to have drugs at home. They are pretty dangerous in hospitals too & drugs increase the risk of Cesarean, in addition to other risks to both baby & mother. Cesarean is major surgery & is more dangerous than normal birth. Women die after Cesarean at a much higher rate than those who deliver vaginally. Hospitals do not publicize these statistics for obvious reasons. England has a much lower rate of Cesarean than the US. BTW, very few home births result in infections, but women get infected in hospitals pretty often, more often after cesarean.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

kate used a sutrogate

Posted at 8:27 AM on August 1, 2013  

Personally i believe she had a surrogate and wore a fake pregnancy bump and now she is getting made out to be the first woman to deliver a baby naturally. I had 2 natural births. Kate came out showing her surrogate baby to the world but if you look at the pics when the camera is looking down on her you can still see the baby bump they are decieving the world. After i had both my kids my belly wen back to shape right away didnt still have a nine month bump like fake kate sorry but she did not give birth to any baby whatsover, its called fooling the nation!!!!!!!!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Hiraani

Posted at 1:24 AM on August 2, 2013  

Damn, I mustn’t have given birth to my baby either. My baby bump was still noticable up to five weeks post partum. But, hey, thanks for telling me I forgot to take off my fake belly.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lorrie Greene

Posted at 11:09 PM on August 3, 2013  

That is not true I have 3 children and you do have baby flab for awhile until you work it off sorry but this is a fact!!!!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Pauline

Posted at 8:01 PM on August 6, 2013  

Oh give me a break. There is no way the royal couple could use a surrogate. Why not be happy for them. You just diguest me.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ketia

Posted at 9:23 AM on September 3, 2013  

hmm thats right

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

katie

Posted at 4:53 AM on September 3, 2013  

you are seriously messed up so you have any idea how many mother I know have had a baby and lookk great after. Just because you didn’t keep a proper diet and you gain 60 pounds doesn’t mean everybody else does.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sam

Posted at 6:13 PM on July 31, 2013  

How do you know this for sure? Or are you guessing? She is such a weakstick I had her down for giving in the minute the contractions started.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sue

Posted at 1:37 AM on July 31, 2013  

women around the world r having babied as we speak without any healthcare, does everyone in britain get the healthcare waity got while giving birth i dont think so, she is spoiled thats why she cant do simple things like public speech!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anna

Posted at 12:17 PM on July 30, 2013  

Thats nice and all but what about the millions of women who have also gone through hours and hours of labor without pain relief. This is not a new concept women give birth naturally everyday.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

lisa

Posted at 4:56 AM on July 30, 2013  

SHE’S SOO LUCKY THE FIRST TIME I HAD MY BABY WAS IN 17 HOURS LABOR.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Carol Ann

Posted at 11:47 AM on July 29, 2013  

Obviously, she had no complications. I guess I am a sissy. I rather be a sissy than an insensitive, uncaring, brute. I am sure the women are just beating your door to be with such a thoughtful loser.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Amanda M. Childress (@AmandaMChildres)

Posted at 4:51 PM on July 29, 2013  

just as Richard answered I cannot believe that a student can make $4687 in 4 weeks on the internet. did you read this site… Ç­a­n9­9.ℂ­ℴ­M

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anne

Posted at 11:20 AM on July 29, 2013  

I am wondering why she would need four widwives.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sam

Posted at 6:15 PM on July 31, 2013  

AND three doctors. The three top gynos in the UK. Talk about overkill; most of us manage with a single competant midwife.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Patty

Posted at 11:01 AM on July 29, 2013  

Sorry this American had four natural child births. No pain relief at all. The largest was over ten pounds. So do not lump us Americans all together please.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Mary

Posted at 10:28 AM on July 29, 2013  

And it was an 8 pound 6 oz. baby! Ouch!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sue

Posted at 10:28 AM on July 29, 2013  

That is a lot of BS, praised for having natural birth poor waity , she shouldnt feel pain, hallo guys women around the world r having babies naturally, some dont even knoW.. c section exists stop babtsitting her she is thirty one not a sixteen year old

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

abe

Posted at 10:12 AM on July 29, 2013  

she ain’t NO sissy like most americans………..

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

s

Posted at 10:59 AM on July 29, 2013  

You are a fool ABE! People don’t CHOOSE to have a c-section stupid, sometimes the babies life or moms life are in danger. It’s not because they’re sissys. IGNORANT FOOL!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

A Mom

Posted at 12:21 PM on July 29, 2013  

C-sections make people sissies. I think not! I had to have a c-section due to my son being breech. I cried all the way to the OR because I didn’t want surgery.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

LEE

Posted at 8:03 AM on August 15, 2013  

ALL OF THIS IS TO MUCH ABOUT NOTHING…IT’S TOTALLY A WOMEN’S CHOOSE,NATURAL OR NOT..THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WHAT COUNTRY YOU LIVE IN..SOME WOMEN HAVE A HIGH LEVEL WHEN IT COMES TO PAIN ,OTHER’S DON’T..FOR ME AFTER 4 HOURS INTO AND 18 HOUR LABOR,I HAD ENOUGH..WHY SUFFER IN PAIN ,WHEN YOU DON’T HAVE TO..IF ANYTHING,WHEN YOU TRY NATURAL ,YOUR BODY TENSES UP,AND CAUSE THE LABOR TO BE LONGER..ONCE YOU HAVE THAT RELIEF FROM THE PAIN YOUR BODY RELAXES AND YOU CAN GO FROM 5 TO10 CEM,VERY QUICKLY .. IT’S A MORE ENJOYABLE BIRTH.INSTEAD OF BEING CONSUME WITH PAIN AND TAKING YOUR ATTENTION OFF THE ARRIVAL OF YOUR BABY BECAUSE YOU ARE IN SUCH PAIN..SOME WOMEN GO THROUGH LABOR ,WITH NOT A LOT OF PAIN AND IT IS AS VERY EASY LABOR..SO WHAT THAT SHE HAD ALL OF THESE MIDWIVES ,IF THAT’S WHAT SHE NEEDED TO GET THROUGH THIS,WHAT’S WRONG WITH THAT..YOU DO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET THROUGH IT..AMERICAN WOMEN ARE LIKE ENGLAND WOMEN,WE ARE ALL WOMEN ARE YOU SERIOUS TO SAY AMERICANS ARE SISSY

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DavidUUU

Posted at 10:07 AM on July 29, 2013  

Do you need any millionaire matchmaker service? My friend Maggie has just married to a handsome wealthy man. They met through~~~~Rìсhfishеs.CοM They told me it is a best dating for wealthy and beautiful singles seeking relationships, dating ,love. Here you will find millionaire matchmaker service from New York, Washington DC, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles and all the way to Toronto Canada, London England and Sydney Australia ,France, Germany , african american who have joined our love boat. All the best! If you are single, have a try. sdfsgsadff

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

A

Posted at 3:12 PM on July 29, 2013  

I am not surprised as my experience was going through 18 hours labor with no pain relief too.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Ali

Posted at 3:58 PM on July 29, 2013  

It is not a competition but I had 3 natural births before a c-section with my fourth baby and the pain from C-section made my howl in pain in a way I had not done during labour. Natural definitely much easier than c-section

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter