Kate Middleton Vs. Kim Kardashian In Pretty Dresses — Whose Look Is Best?

Mon, April 29, 2013 5:13pm EST by 26 Comments
Kim Kardashian Kate Middleton
SplashNews

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

Andrew

Posted at 1:33 PM on May 26, 2013  

One is a fat & ugly wears 20 lbs of makeup plastic surgery loving porn star disgusting hog giving birth to her monkey ape low IQ’ed bastard retarded monkey spawn while being married to another man. The other is an educated slim and beautiful regal woman who is going to be Queen of England one day and is giving birth to a future monarch. There is nothing to compare here…NOTHING!! Move along now.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Madie Ruth Jackson

Posted at 6:29 PM on May 8, 2013  

And to bring the firstfruits of our ground, and the first fruits of our ground, and the firstfruits of our ground, and the firstfruits of all fruit of all trees, year by year, unto the house of the Lord’ Also the firstborn of our sons, and of our flocks, to bring to the house of our God, unto the priests that minister in the house of our God: to the house of our God, unto the priests that minister in the House of our God’ verse37

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Delia

Posted at 10:26 PM on May 4, 2013  

Are Kim and Kate Middleton related at all ? There is always such a tie between them, but they are not actually related ? or are they ?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DuchessOfCrotch

Posted at 10:21 PM on May 4, 2013  

Kim and Waity are soul sisters ! LOL Waity and Kim both have “problems”, it’s the most hysterical thing, I love it. Waity could have no better twin than Kim. They are BOTH trashy. Thank you KIm, for high-lighting the trashy side of Waity.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Julia

Posted at 10:19 AM on May 2, 2013  

Is there any contest? Kim looks a trash most of the time. Unfortunately trash is the preferred American style.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DuchessOfCrotch

Posted at 10:17 PM on May 4, 2013  

Hey , ENGLISH Waity was a crotch-flasher. And still gets photographed without panties and nude as a jaybird outdoors. Moron -

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Chris Green

Posted at 3:34 PM on April 30, 2013  

I have to say 99 times out of 100 I would say Kate but Kim looks great! It’s nice to see here dress respectably.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

self

Posted at 10:38 AM on April 30, 2013  

Please kate is a hypocrite, in public she dresses like a grandma and while on secret / hiding vacation she goes butt naked in public not even kim

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Mel

Posted at 8:46 AM on April 30, 2013  

Really HL? why do you continue to ask these stupid questions and get these idiots to spew their vitriol? they are clearly doing two totally different things, so they are dressed appropriately for what they are doing, they both look great, kate is dressed appropriately for what she is doing and Kim looks beautiful and relaxed for her yacht dinner. Why is this even a question? and ummmm to the idiots that claim that there is no comparison, Kate is merely a woman who married a prince, it’s not like she is some type of born royal, so stop the foolishness, and stop calling that woman a porn star, she made a freaking tape in the privacy of her own home with her idiot man of 5 years who chose to sell the tape after she dumped him, you may want to look up what a porn star actually is, some of you people are so idiotic. I feel sorry for your children whether you have them now or one day, you will have hell to pay for your nastiness, just don’t ask WHY when it goes down.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ick

Posted at 7:00 AM on April 30, 2013  

there more to wear then coats there kate lord she looks like an old granny state of what she wears she defo could do with a stylist

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lilly

Posted at 5:54 AM on April 30, 2013  

Is there any contest?Kim looks a trash can which is what she is.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Yaright

Posted at 2:54 AM on April 30, 2013  

I think must irk the royal family I mean the Kardashian family are trying to liken themselves to the Middleton clan to clean up their image.

While the Middleton are commoners and known to pose in barely anything or sometimes toilet paper… they are not porn queens!

Likening Kim Krapstastic to someone who is now considered a member of the firm is laughable.
nice try HL and KKKlan

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DuchessOfCrotch

Posted at 10:24 PM on May 4, 2013  

YES THEY ARE PORN QUEENS !!! My God, wake up — Waity went nude outdoors, like a complete slut. And she was a crotch-flasher during her 9 years of being a public party girl. Then even after the marriage the slut still goes without panties, like in Calgary,Canada. Then gripes about her “privacy”. Waity is a slut.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kiki

Posted at 1:37 AM on April 30, 2013  

They both are beautiful pregnant woman with great style!! Their styles are completely different but that certainly doesn’t mean that one is more important than the other!! I can’t believe how tiny princess kates bump is though!! They’re both adorable!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

kate

Posted at 12:56 AM on April 30, 2013  

I agree this is totally no comparison.
Kim buys and chooses her own clothes.
Kate uses tax payers money and someone to dress her.
yep no comparison, get your facts straight before judging another person’s character, you guys don’t know her, hell i don’t even know her, but when I see other women putting another woman down, i just get angry because it’s like we’re taking ourselves back in time. I don’t mean to be angry, but I guess is my hormones and the words that my grandmother always used ” if you don’t have anything good to say about a person don’t say anything at all” so people shut up and clean your hearts and mind before hiding behind a phone, computer or whatever you’re using to spread your hatred.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

1redowl

Posted at 1:13 AM on April 30, 2013  

Reply to kate:

I am a Canadian. Therefore The Queen is my Head of State and I am familiar with the system..

I will not get into the complexities of how the British Royal Family operates its finances but you are speaking in a way that suggests to me that you don’t know that The British Royal Family generates more income than you can ever imagine. Members of the British Royal Family are not “paid for by tax-payers” to put anyone out financially. Perhaps $1.00 U.S. per annum. The Queen is very wealthy in her own right and members of The Family pay for their personal wardrobes, etc. A single appearance of someone like The Duchess of Cambridge at an event generates enough income to offset any costs for her clothes which her Husband, Prince William covers with his allowance.
The only cost for the tax-payers are security expenses at a special event, such as The Royal Wedding, which in itself is offset by all of the sales for memorabilia and tourism..

The tax payers also cover the cost of protecting any foreign visitors such as a visit by President and Mrs. Obama. Your country does the same in reverse. You pay for the security of foreign visitors through your taxes and whenever Mrs. Obama decides to take her daughters on a vacation.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Michelle

Posted at 2:33 AM on April 30, 2013  

Well said!

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lilly

Posted at 5:55 AM on April 30, 2013  

So true.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DuchessOfCrotch

Posted at 10:19 PM on May 4, 2013  

“THE DUCHESS OF CAMBRIDGE” is an exhibitionist.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Stacey

Posted at 11:14 AM on April 30, 2013  

You may want to get your facts straight. The Kardashian’s stylist is Monica Rose.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John M

Posted at 12:20 AM on April 30, 2013  

IS THIS A JOKE !!!!!!! ?

HOLLYWOOD has purposely done this comparison to PROVOKE Public’s anger

HOW CAN KIM K be EVERRRR Compared to the Princess Kate !!!!!!!

BOYCOTT HOLLYWOOD LIFE ! GET A LIFE

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

RedOwl

Posted at 12:55 AM on April 30, 2013  

Obviously, a lot of your readers enjoy HOLLYWOOD LIFE but speaking for myself and reading the comments of others, I would enjoy some topics that make more sense.
Surely there are other Hollywood Moms-to-be to use as a comparison to Kim.
Isn’t Jessica Simpson also pregnant?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

candy

Posted at 7:01 PM on April 29, 2013  

This comparison is a huge insult to the Duchess of Cambridge. I’m going to boycott Hollywood Life just because of this – horrible. Kim is nothing but a low life porn star.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

me again

Posted at 7:35 PM on April 29, 2013  

i agree kim will never look better then the princess, until this stops i am done

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DuchessOfCrotch

Posted at 10:20 PM on May 4, 2013  

LOL !!! Party-girl / crotch flasher / public drunk / royal-chaser Middlewton is NO BETTER than KIm. It’s so funny that Kim has herself stuck like glue to waity !!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

RedOwl

Posted at 5:26 PM on April 29, 2013  

I think that it’s time to put this Kate vs Kim contest to bed!
It’s difficult for me to imagine a day when Kim Kardashian would ever look prettier or more elegant than the Duchess of Cambridge.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter