Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart’s Body Language: ‘So In Love’ — Expert

Wed, March 20, 2013 7:06pm EDT by 84 Comments
Kristen Stewart Robert Pattinson Date
Courtesy Of Instagram

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

lol !

Posted at 7:46 AM on March 24, 2013  

Kristen i hope A TRUO

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 11:10 AM on March 24, 2013  

@ lol !
WTF is a truo !?!?!?
lol

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ff

Posted at 12:10 PM on March 23, 2013  

my Bf is an A55hole and I can fck whoever whenever he’ll is just like my dog

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Liesel

Posted at 10:24 PM on March 22, 2013  

All the people that were talking Robsten breakup are now talking photoshop or complaining that Rob doesn’t look happy. I call it changing the topic of conversation when you were wrong. Those same people said Rob was over Kristen and happier than ever in Australia. They were spinning conversation to say that Rob didn’t need Kristen, but that’s who he came right back to. All I saw in Australia was Rob working and being pleasant as always in a couple of videos for the promotion of the film. I saw him posing with random women that he met while eating in restaurants. The same sort of pics he’s always taken. It was all spin to prove that Rob was over Kristen but he’s not over her at all. He’s still with her.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jane

Posted at 5:49 PM on March 21, 2013  

so THIS is what LOVE looks like ??????? i dont think so————————

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 6:31 PM on March 21, 2013  

My bad: the shirt is black plaid, NOT blue. In the slourescent light of late night, and the glare of the compy screen ,it looked blue.
Wow, I have never seen a black plaid shirt before… he looks great in black.
Wow, he is 6’1 !?! She is a lil bitty thing at what ? 5’4, 5’6 ?
I wonder h … never mind….

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ryan

Posted at 4:16 PM on March 21, 2013  

Rob looks tired. But if he didn’t want to be out with Kristen no way does that little girl drag a six foot one inch male anywhere he doesn’t want to be. I don’t care how tired or dehydrated he may be. The photo? Probably not his idea..ever. But to please his lady…. Yes indeed. In his place I would do the same. Anything for the one I love.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 6:21 PM on March 21, 2013  

I agree. IF this is NOT photoshopped, then he does look tired, and yeah, maybe did go out with her, because he loves her. Poor guy.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

geraldine stewart de pattinson twilighter

Posted at 3:57 PM on March 21, 2013  

voten por kristen stewart en los kids choice awards ahhhhhhhh robsten se ven muy lindos juntos los amo

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lauren

Posted at 3:07 PM on March 21, 2013  

Robert returned home, back to Kristen, she is your home!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cris k

Posted at 3:05 PM on March 21, 2013  

I’m so happy for them, showing a mature and solid relationship, they are incredible, together they are tremendously strong!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

JEN

Posted at 2:58 PM on March 21, 2013  

EHH?? In love?? Come on Rob looks miserable okay you can see it in his eyes and the look on his face that he dosen’t want his picture taken

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

d.harris

Posted at 8:22 AM on March 21, 2013  

i do not know if hl is blind but,even a one eye person will see the photo above clearly.i see no love there in the photo .it looks like rob is trying so hard to be there.looks like a man trying to distance himself from something he never really want to do.as for the body language expert ,he or she need to get back to school.is not really seeing the picture.i keep wondering when the lies will be over.like i said before ,they will keep playing the game till they cannot hide it anymore,cos it seems they do not know how to break the news,for a lot of reason we all know.as for rob i think is too old for all these tenage drama.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ayesha

Posted at 8:02 AM on March 21, 2013  

ypee finally they are back together i am so happy

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sinay

Posted at 7:59 AM on March 21, 2013  

He just looks to be leaning back and posing for a shot imo
Don’t know how they got from this photo to “happy” and “together”

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Richard,19,Brooklyn

Posted at 6:33 AM on March 21, 2013  

@better days: I wish i could say that too,sista.But its none of my business.There are some group of people here who always uses Rob as their fantasy object alongside with their beloved strong woman.For them,If he doesn”t live with that strong woman,than he is a coward and douchbag,but if he does they go gaga about him.Now tell me,how can i share thoughts with these low life hypocrites.Rob is not a doll or a toy,he is just a sexy boy.Thats what i believe.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Margaret

Posted at 7:25 AM on March 21, 2013  

Hes a grown man 27 not a kid in UK he would be well married by now probably with a child and thats as an actor not just a everyday person Hes not a Toy oir a sex object for anyone hes just a fella who happens to be good on the eye . He seems to like strong women and not very girlie girlie types either he seems to want a 22 year old who looks 22 not 32 glitter glam girls One person on here said him and JL wer sould mates no way 1 he doesnt fancy blondes and 2 JL has had at least 2 if not 3 Plastic surgery to make her as pretty as she is look at pictures taken of her over 3 years ago she has a COMPLETLY different nose and she had quite small lips now she has nice med size full lips her cheeks seem to have been made thinnner (lipo) Fancy a 23 year old feeling so insecure she did that to herself Kristen has bags under her eyes she had them in TWI 1 at 17 he still has them shes not had them taken away JHe seems to want to be with her I think he needs a strong person/women around him but then maybe not I dont know him so who knows

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sisi south africa

Posted at 11:13 AM on March 21, 2013  

@margaret they have said kristen had a nose job and a boob job too and her pictures are different from when she was young and now so stop that NONSENSE. If JL has had plastic surgery so did kristen .FINISH!!!

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

???

Posted at 5:37 AM on March 21, 2013  

The girl who posted the picture says it was of her friend who doesn’t have twitter. She is a professional photographer. Wonder if the picture is authentic. Looks strange.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 6:26 PM on March 21, 2013  

@ ??? I agree, it DOES look strange. I mean of Kristen and the brunette chick, yeah,that looks natural, but Rob being there, it does look rather off-looking.
Yeah, wearing the same shirt from the Oz wrap party ?!? With his money he can afford new shirts. But then, maybe he washed it, because when he came bald-headed, he was wearing a blue plaid shirt then this red plaid one.
Wow…. odd-looking pic.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Margaret

Posted at 12:56 AM on March 27, 2013  

Sorry this is for SISI who wont leave a reply button I looked at what you wrote went online and sorry sis nothing her bags under her eyes are there in 2008 and are still there now in fact if I was her id be tempted to take them away what they are (Im a nurse) is fat deposits its usually genetic
I looked at her MUM she has them too Kristen is almost flat chested 34A id say if shes had her boobs made bigger she went to a wrong Plastic surg whod go for that small shes tinny booby wise Nose job I looked nope not that I could tell I looked at pictures from 14 onwards in films and her nose lookes exactly the same. Your graping at any straw youd have never mentioned her boobs and nose If I hadnt said JL had had a nose job it was even in the mags and PS said all of them its 100% that she had the bride of her nose filled down and the sides to make her nose narrower and more refined Her lips were lovely I liked them but she didnt they have been plumped up with fillers again PS said the same you dont go from small thinnish lips to fullsome lips over a year or so lips dont grow thcker your nose doesnt totaly reshape its self NOW I wasnt putting her down not one jot I like her think shes a nice young women though wish shed dress her age but Its sad that she felt she had to do that to herself at what 21 thats the pressure thats put on starlets its not just amazing talet they have to LOOK amazing as well and she does I still prefer Kristens normal everyday 22 year old look myself no glitz no glam but that doesnt take away anything from JL

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Fantasia

Posted at 5:33 AM on March 21, 2013  

Can u say photoshopped. Hilarious. Looks like a Rob wax work.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

joycet

Posted at 4:39 PM on March 21, 2013  

I agree! It does look photoshopped. He’s wearing same shirt from Aussie film wrap party. What – with all his money – wearing same old dirty shirt?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 6:27 PM on March 21, 2013  

@ joycet : I agree.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

domino

Posted at 5:33 AM on March 21, 2013  

@DB is that the picture where he is clean shaven that he looks playfull in? And then LITTERALLY 6 hours later he had almost full hair… lol he is a WOLF after all.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

DB

Posted at 4:33 AM on March 21, 2013  

Not sure what picture your body language expert is looking at but in this one Rob doesn’t look even a speck as happy as he was in all the fan photos from Australia. Even the one right off the plane when he arrived there showed a happy and playful Rob, here not so much…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 2:20 AM on March 21, 2013  

Not “may” but I meant to type ” more”

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 2:18 AM on March 21, 2013  

Oh and another thought:
Rob keeps his price low for two reasons: One: by being cheap, he can (hopefully ) be snagged an indy director, and indy directors are more flexable in their direction and art form, whereas a big-budget / big studio film has a lot of pressure to be a certain status quo,and meet higher standards. And indy directors are allowed my freedome as to what they film. The guidelines for big studio films are way more stricter than indy ones are.
Directors are more apt to grab a “cheap” actor,rather than a hig-paid one. Why ??
Because by keeping their price low, they may get more work.
Oh and by the way: an indy film, is not less dignified,nor is it less spectatular in any way, than a big-studio one. take a look at some of the indy films that made history.
Remember a small little movie called ” Juno” ? yeah, it made quite the killing.
Remember a little movie called Twilight ?? yeah, THAT indy move def made history.
The indy (art-house) films are more likely to capture a smaller audience,yeah, but they are also less riskier to make, because they are smaller scale. The directors can then take more risks. The actors can then put more into their characters and have a wee bit more freedom in making that character.

If they flop, then the fall-out is not as bad.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Margaret

Posted at 7:17 AM on March 21, 2013  

I totally agree with you see IM a fair minded person If I tihnk a thing is right I will admit it Indy films are a great way to make a better name for yourself as a moire ser actor. Thing is how many USA and I have to admit UK and Ozz Cinemas will show it? The Rover I mean USA companies own up to 85% of all Cinemas in Ozz and they show and distribute mainly USA fims there are a few UK ones that get seen hardly any European they are left to the few small indi cinemas its mainly USA films and as they own Birch Carrol Hoyts etc they show what they like . Its not just up and coming stars that ap[ear in INdi films remember Gandolph in LORings Sir Ian Mcellan He reg goes on shows in UK he even appeared on our oldest soap opera Coronation street circa 1960 still running 4 nights a week he came on that show for 16 episodes for abso nothing Plenty of UK HUGE stars reg go to Rep theat all over UK and play a part in a play for actors equity wages Its a way of giving back and helping the younger actors BUT Ozz has nothing like that it has no Rep Theatres NO Vaudeville type summer shows in Seaside places no Poer entertainment like the UK NO Variety shows on TV except the X factor The Voice etc No Ozz plays Ozz TV shows except for news and current affiar shows over 75% USA/UK shows main reason is if Ozz wants to buy say Resort or NCI it has to buy it in a bundel with some of the shows that USA took off TV as ratings were so bad we here get them. I dont know if the Rover is an Indi film but it was made on a shoe string budget famously Ozzies dont go to thweir own films thats why they too bomb but maybe with him in they will go see how it is Maybe because of him the USA cinemas will show it take a chance on a small film made in the outback of Ozz

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nobody Special

Posted at 3:44 PM on March 21, 2013  

@ margaret: I stand corrected on most points. I did not see bel Ami in cinema, we did not get it in our small town, but the larger one ( 40 miles away) did.
We did see Water For Elephants,and it did ok, here. Not as good as Twi but ok.
I think Uk people have better oppertunity to see theater, ie: summer theater, vaudeville,theater ( live theater) all that, like we have here.
We do not have vaudeville, but we certainly have more than Oz does…
Maybe the Rover will do better in the UK rather than Oz, but not happy that Oz keeps their stuff in Oz: they need to branch out more…

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter