Poor Kate! English novelist and Man Booker Prize winner Hilary has dissed the Duchess repeatedly in a new article, calling her ‘plastic.’ Not cool, Hilary.
Kate Middleton is having a tough time since she announced her pregnancy, as not only has she been hospitalized for morning sickness, she has had bump pictures taken while she was in a bikini. Now, a scathing English critic called Hilary Mantel has called Kate “plastic” and “painfully thin,” and implies that her only purpose is to provide an heir for the throne. Hilary, if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all! Read on to see what else Hilary has to say, and why I think she is out of line.
Hilary Mantel Disses Kate Middleton
Hilary, who is a two-time Man Booker prize winner, a novelist, a essayist and a critic wrote an article called “Royal Bodies” for the London Review Of Books, and in it she totally slams the Duchess of Cambridge.
Hilary, 60, is unnecessarily mean and cruel to pregnant Kate, 31, as she disses her for being slim and she implies that Kate cannot read. So harsh!
In the first scathing paragraph of the article, Hilary says that she would like to give Kate a copy of Caroline Weber‘s Queen of Fashion: What Marie Antoinette Wore to the Revolution, because she thinks Kate is “a jointed doll on which certain rags are hung.” She says that Kate has “no personality of her own, entirely defined by what she wore.”
Meow Hilary! And it gets worse, as Hilary compares Kate to a Barbie doll.
“But Kate Middleton, as she was, appeared to have been designed by a committee and built by craftsmen, with a perfect plastic smile and the spindles of her limbs hand-turned and gloss-varnished.”
Here are some more gems from the article:
“But in her first official portrait by Paul Emsley, unveiled in January, her eyes are dead and she wears the strained smile of a woman who really wants to tell the painter to bugger off.”
“Kate seems to have been selected for her role of princess because she was irreproachable: as painfully thin as anyone could wish, without quirks, without oddities, without the risk of the emergence of character. She appears precision-made, machine-made, so different from [Princess] Diana whose human awkwardness and emotional incontinence showed in her every gesture.”
This is so mean!
Yes, Kate is a rather slim woman, but she is so much more than a royal baby making machine. Hilary has literally called Kate a doll, dead behind the eyes, and a robot. I appreciate that Hilary is trying to a point that Diana was famously controversial and outspoken, while Kate is reserved and polite (much to the Royal family’s relief), but this article is so insulting to Kate.
Kate has a degree in Art History, she does a huge amount of charity work, and she is an active wife and soon-to-be-mother. She is much more than a royal clothes horse who’s sole purpose is to create a royal baby.
Kate, my advice: ignore this bitter and rude hag and enjoy your pregnancy!
What do YOU think HollywoodLifers? Is Hilary totally out of line?
WATCH: Kate Middleton Bikini Baby Bump Photographed In New Scandal
– Eleanore Hutch
More Kate Middleton News:
- Kate Middleton Reveals Baby Bump For First Time Since Photo Scandal
- Kate Middleton ‘Nervous’ About Giving Birth To Royal Baby
- Kate Middleton’s 7 Most Shocking Moments — Topless, Pregnant & More
Pi
Posted at 9:26 PM on March 22, 2013
Kate appears to be genuinely kind and pleasant and she should not be begrudged for being the wife and having fallen in love with the heir of the throne.
Nonetheless, what should matter most is the fact that the present day doesn’t need royals who possess and have so much wealth as the number of poor people in this planet, or perhaps more..
We don’t realize how much we give to them by supporting and talking about them amidst all other world issues. Propaganda that we unknowingly support.
If there are royal matters that matter, it is the fact that they still own a vast majority of possessions inherited from generations and the question is whether they are entitled to it? The manner of acquisition may not have justified the lives of those of whom who were deprived. But of course, I am also not a supporter of the French idea of violence against royals in the years past.
What matters today is equality of chances and the liberty to pursue your dreams. If there are newsworthy or feature articles to be written, they should be for extraordinary people who make themselves a success out of a little something or nothing.