Tameka Raymond Blasts Usher: ‘Money Can Buy Many Things’

Sun, August 26, 2012 5:01pm EST by 17 Comments
Usher Tameka Raymond Appeal
FameFlynet

Tameka may have lost primary custody of her sons to Usher, but she’s not going down without a fight! Read on for more details.

Tameka Raymond is reportedly pushing forward with an appeal after ex-husband Usher was awarded primary custody of their two sons on Friday, Aug. 24.

“Money can buy many things…But in the end. Truth & goodness will prevail. I must continue to believe this. Stand firm,” Tameka tweeted on Aug. 24.

Sources close to Tameka tell TMZ, “[Tameka] feels the ruling was unfair. Tameka allegedly found out that Usher’s lawyer’s law firm threw an election fundraiser back in 2008 for the judge who presided over the trial, and she feels that connection may have influenced the ruling.”

What do YOU think, HollywoodLifers? Should Tameka appeal? Who should get custody?

[TMZ]

[Twitter]

– Christopher Rogers

More Usher & Tameka news:

  1. Usher’s Ex-Wife Tameka Foster Accuses Him Of Faking Grief Over Stepson
  2. Usher’s Stepson’s Passing Could Lead To More Serious Charges — Report
  3. Usher Wants To Settle Custody Battle In Wake Of Stepson Tragedy

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

d.harris

Posted at 5:45 AM on August 27, 2012  

@ stupid pple,is really funny.you do not want usher but ,you want to keep his name.she is not out for love but,for money and fame——–typical gold-digger.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

d.harris

Posted at 5:43 AM on August 27, 2012  

tameka is really not a nice person.she is the one that is all about saying all kinds of things about usher,calling him all kinds of names.but ,if she is really a good mother her priority should be the safety and wellfare of her kids .she should have made sure this divorce was quietly settled behind closed door without advertising it everyday on tweeter like and other media outlets like goods.i personally do not think that there is undergroung thing concerning the ruling of the judge.those kids are better off with usher.he is really a good father and love and care for those kids ,both his and the ones that is not his.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sonja

Posted at 8:29 AM on August 27, 2012  

So true. I am glad that some one else think the same wasy as me.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

bubba love sponge

Posted at 12:53 AM on August 27, 2012  

usher told us magazine he endorses Romney

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Stupid ppl...

Posted at 8:16 PM on August 26, 2012  

Its been years since theyve been divorced. I dont get this girl. You took him to court about this situation and was telling the judge he was sleeping which yo bridemaids and hes a no good father yet u still have his last name and continue to ask him for more and more financial help. Hes suppose to be supporting the kids not her.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Carol

Posted at 6:32 PM on August 26, 2012  

And why is she always on Twitter or giving statements?????? Drop Usher’s last name, go away and grieve your Son’s death!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sonja

Posted at 7:59 PM on August 26, 2012  

I agree shoot he wasn’t usher real son. but he loved the boy as if he was his own son. And if you asked me. All this woman want is his money. There a name for those kind of woman. And I ‘m a lady so i’m not saying what she is. I’m on your side Usher you deserved those boys. God bless you honey.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Carol

Posted at 6:27 PM on August 26, 2012  

If she is supposedly the one who is at home more or has the more “stable” work hours then why does she need a nanny??? Wasn’t Usher found in contempt for not paying Tameka’s nanny ($1300)? Also, there was another witness who testified that she accompanied Tameka and the boys on a trip or vacation, and she flew on one airline with the two little boys and Tameka took another flight on a different airline! What Mother would not fly with their own 4 & 3 year olds?

How many photos have you seen with Tameka out and about with those children, going to the grocery store, in the park, at the pumpkin patch, dropping them off at nursery school or play dates? And don’t say that she isn’t the famous one with paparazzi following her because I’m sure everyone knows what she looks like so I’m sure they would snap her photo if she was out with them. This is the same MOTHER who flew down to Brazil a few months after she had the last baby and almost died while having plastic surgery and no one even knew she was out of the country! And exactly WHERE was she when her son Kile had his accident that she couldn’t have caught the next commercial flight back to Atlanta, but Usher had to send his (or paid for a) private jet to fly her back? The same MOTHER who didn’t have primary custody of Kile and Ryan because she left them to be with Usher. Yeah, she is the better parent because she will actually BE with them. NOT!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

laura

Posted at 5:46 PM on August 26, 2012  

of course the boys should be with mom, usher will only have nanny’s take care of the boys so much better off with mom……..usher come on take a chill pill!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

heather

Posted at 6:09 PM on August 26, 2012  

you do know she willingly walked away from her first 2 sons to be with him, right? why does she want these 2? oh yea, she will get paid….lovely!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cali

Posted at 7:40 PM on August 26, 2012  

Exactly!
It’s all about the money; after all she has none after lsoing custody – these kids were her meal ticket and lifestyle support.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Beth

Posted at 6:18 PM on August 26, 2012  

Why should he? They are his kids too. There had to be more to it than is being released.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cc

Posted at 5:16 PM on August 26, 2012  

The children should b with mother everyday, do to his (usher) job. The children need there mother period. Just turn around n ask your mother.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

michelle

Posted at 6:39 PM on August 26, 2012  

if the courts told them away from their mother given their fathers busy lifestyle. she must really be screwed up

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cc

Posted at 5:15 PM on August 26, 2012  

The children should b with mother everyday, do to his (usher) job. The children need there mother period. Just turn around n ask to mother.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

CATHY

Posted at 9:49 PM on September 2, 2012  

TAMEKA’S NOT STUPID, SHE HAD ALL OF THOSE KIDS
FOR MONEY, THEY ARE HER MEAL TICKET, BUT IT’S TRUE
YOU’VE NEVER EVER SEEN THOSE BOYS WITH HER IN PUBLIC
UNTIL SHE MARRIED USHER, THAT WAS JUST FOR CELEBRITY
STATUS. MS JONETTA SAW STRAIGHT THUR HER PLOY
SO NOW’S SHE’S LOST HER MONEY, NOW WHAT TAMEKA?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sonja

Posted at 11:27 PM on September 2, 2012  

No comment.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter