Rob Pattinson And 'Cosmopolis' Get Mixed Reviews

Fri, May 25, 2012 2:27pm EST by 7 Comments

Sadly not everyone is loving Rob’s performance in Cosmopolis! The movie itself gets mixed reviews as well!

It’s no secret how much we love Robert Pattinson‘s acting skills, but unfortunately there are some movie critics that don’t agree! His movie Cosmopolis debuted today to mixed reviews at Cannes Film Festival.

Critics could not agree on whether they liked the David Cronenberg directed film about a wealthy man who travels around NYC for a day in a limo looking to get a haircut, and encountering a lot of life problems along the way. A few critics panned Rob’s performance, but as more reviews come out, a lot of critics are praising Rob for his “cool” performance of Eric Packer, even if they didn’t love the movie. Here’s a breakdown of the reviews:

The Hollywood Reporter:

“After a strong run of films during the past decade, David Cronenberg blows a tire with Cosmopolis. […] On the page and on film, Eric is a controlled and controlling figure, a man impervious to society’s norms who one must feel has a mind operating well beyond the capacities of mere mortals. He’s utterly humorless and without detectable compassion or accessible humanity, which makes him less than companionable as a character. Pattinson doesn’t help matters by revealing nothing behind the eyes and delivering nearly all his lines with the same rhythm and intonations, plus repetitive head nods in the bargain. It’s a tough character that perhaps a young Jeremy Irons could have made riveting, but Pattinson is too bland and monotonous to hold the interest.”

The Huffington Post:

“Featuring an ensemble cast built on quick cameos, the film is anchored by a solid, ennui-filled performance by Robert Pattinson, shedding his Twilight skin for something more substantive and reminiscent of Christian Bale in American Pyscho. The challenge of compressing such dense literary concepts in filmic form is immense, and Cronenberg should definitely be applauded for his ambitious attempt at bringing these abstractions to life. Yet there is an undeniable stale and static quality to Cosmopolis that makes it feel like watching someone read a book. […] Despite the interesting concepts, there is no escaping the lack of cinematic energy that keeps Cosmopolis from feeling like anything more than a perfunctory adaptation. Overall Grade: C+”

The Playlist:

[Cosmopolis is] both an exceptional adaptation and a remarkable work unto itself. Eric Packer [is played by] a surprisingly adequate Robert Pattinson. […] Everything matters in Cronenberg’s “Cosmopolis,” but not everything is necessarily the same as DeLillo’s book. And that makes the film, as a series of discussions about inter-related money-minded contradictions, insanely rich and maddeningly complex. We can’t wait to rewatch it.”


“Interestingly enough, if you’re casting for a dead-eyed shark wreathed in unearned privilege, Pattinson turns out to be a pretty good choice. […] The film’s cynicism is both majestic and well-earned; at one point, Eric notes “… nobody hates the rich … everybody thinks they’re ten seconds away from being rich.” A chilly, crisp and crystal-shard sharp satire of our money-crazed world, “Cosmopolis” takes us on a limo ride through the collapse of modern society: We’re not behind the wheel for this ride, but rest assured, in the end, we’re going to have to get out and pay for it. Rating: 4/5″


“Give David Cronenberg credit for one thing: His choice to cast Robert Pattinson was an inspired and brilliant decision. While Cosmopolis is a bit too one-note to allow any proclamations about Pattinson’s range, his opaque, handsome, sometimes robot-like face compliments Cronenberg’s themes and styles perfectly. In terms of what the director seems to be aiming for here, his cold performance is nearly flawless. […] Rather than a thriller, Cosmopolis plays more like a wispy film of ideas, with conversations in the limo about society, wealth and humanity dominating most of the screen time. Almost all of these feel detached and meticulously unfocused. […]Leos Carax’s Holy Motors is much more fun, but Cronenberg has still made an odd, uncompromising and occasionally brilliant film of his own, one which is well worth seeing if only for the deft way the Cronenberg finds an emotional arc in such an inhuman world. Or else to see how perfectly Pattinson’s performance suits the director.”

Time Out London:

“‘Cosmopolis’ is at its best when it’s otherworldly and aching with artifice. It’s at its worst when it becomes weighed down by an excessive, wearying wordiness, or when it steps out of the limo – the film’s self-imposed arena of surreality – and into a place more like the real world. ‘Cosmopolis’ threatens to soar and to be important, but it only offers flashes of lucidity; the limo is a mesmerising bubble that is quickly burst when the film steps outside it. That said, there’s a consistent air of charged, end-of-days menace running through the film, which Cronenberg handles with an unbroken sense of precision and confidence. He’s well-served, too, by a leering, disintegrating Pattinson, giving a commanding, sympathetic portrait of a man being consumed by his own vanity and power. 3/5″

Empire Online:

“The stylised nature of the language will limit this film’s appeal, and its self-conscious craziness might also be testing to some (why does the professional barber Eric finally visits cut huge steps in his hair?). And after Water For Elephants it remains to be seen whether Pattinson’s teen following really is willing to follow him anywhere. But Cosmopolis does prove that he has the chops, and he parlays his cult persona beautifully into the spoiled, demanding Packer, a man so controlling and ruthless that only he has the power to ruin himself. Lean and spiky – with his clean white shirt he resembles a groomed Sid Vicious – Pattinson nails a difficult part almost perfectly, recalling those great words of advice from West Side Story: You wanna live in this crazy world? Play it cool.”

The Guardian:

“David Cronenberg’s Cosmopolis, adapted by the director from the Don DeLillo novella, is stilted, self-important and dismayingly shallow, featuring an egg-laying cameo from Juliette Binoche, among others — although Paul Giamatti and Mathieu Amalric put some recognisable human life into theirs. As the star, Robert Pattinson’s face is set in an immobile semi-sneer of super-cool unshockability. […] Well, you don’t go to a Cronenberg movie for comedy, but rather for something exciting, exotic, daring and precise: really, none of those things is present in this agonisingly self-conscious and meagre piece of work.”

At least we know his biggest fan Kristen Stewart is always around to support Rob, but hopefully the reviews will continue to get better for his movie!

More Rob and Kristen here:

  1. Kristen looks gorgeous at Rob’s premiere!
  2. Kristen doesn’t want Rob to cheat!
  3. Rob thinks Kristen is amazing in her new movie!

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment


Posted at 10:53 AM on June 9, 2012  

There is an article from the Inquisitr…”Cosmopolis roars into Cannes: First wave majority? Robert Pattinson nailed it” It pretty much says it all starting with bad to awesome. I didn’t expect HL to paint a fair picture, but I did expect more coming directly from you, Bonniie. I was wrong.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 8:17 AM on May 26, 2012  

i just wait the movie out but sure cosmopolis perfect good enought to see robert in the action good job rob

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

HWL sucks

Posted at 6:33 AM on May 26, 2012  

Ha at Hollywoodlife mainly posting the negative and excluding the positives from Variety and others. The movie may have gotten mixed reivews but Robert Pattinson got mainly positive reviews.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 12:20 AM on May 26, 2012  

We the movie going, ticket buying public will decide if Rob is good in this film or if the critics are too wrapped up in his handsome looks to give him a fair appraisal of his role and character portrayal. We know that as a rule in Hollywood, the oscar does not usually go to the fairest of them all regardless of performance.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 10:37 PM on May 25, 2012  

Excerpt from Filmoria. They gave the film 5 out of 5 stars and LOVED Rob:

But the film’s true driving force (excuse the pun) is Pattinson’s utterly fearless, audacious and sizzling performance. Both Twilight stars have now had films here in Cannes and both Kristen Stewart and Pattinson have given some of the festival’s strongest roles. Packer is a multi-layered, cynical, and chillingly captivating character; he’s a gritty brush-stroke of our modern day society, a itching rash that demands attending to. The world in which Packer resides in is one of disgusting wealth and luxury yet crippling doubt, paranoia, and self-loathing. Pattinson’s darkly comic and distressingly real performance here embodies everything Cosmopolis desires to express; he whispers and scuttles but his manners and aura leave a deafening echo hanging in the tainted, dystopian atmosphere.

Cronenberg’s latest will not be for everyone – it’s a slinky, scabby and repressed black dramedy that’s unobliging and unconventional – I’m sure some ‘Twihards’ will enter upon release simply for R-Patz and leave the cinema feeling either bored, bruised or baffled, but for those who enjoy challenging, alternative and uncompromising pictures, Cosmopolis is your drink of choice.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 8:24 PM on May 25, 2012  

If you include Hollywood Reporter you’ve also gotta include Variety to be fair.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Rachel Garber

Posted at 1:55 PM on May 26, 2012  

One reviewer, Empire Online, says “it remains to be seen whether Pattinon’s teen following really will follow him anywhere. Excuse me, he also has an adult following, as in beyong Young Adults. We are the ones who went to see him in Remember Me, in Water For Elephants, and we continue to fill the movie theatres for all of his films. Let the teens follow Taylor Lautner, Rob is twenty-six years old, he is not going to continue to make films that appeal to the teens that were his first fans, and that is as it should be. Did you have the same response to Daniel Radcliffe’s films after his quite long career as Harry Potter. This isn’t the days when actors continue to play youthful careers well into adulthood. His career will be more successful as he continues to play adult roles.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter