Was Kim Kardashian Banned From Attending The Met Ball?

Wed, May 9, 2012 8:27am EDT by 52 Comments
Kim Kardashian Banned From Met Ball 2012

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

kendall

Posted at 2:51 AM on May 22, 2012  

You’ve seen her without a make up? You must be kidding. She never go out of her house without tons of heavy make up evven when she’s sleeping she still make up so how did you see w/out any make up?

In one of theepisodes of heir show, khloe asked Kim whore why did she madde that Sex video and Kim hoe said,”SHE. LOVES SEX!

So pls stop trying to convince yourself that she. Is clean, nice and innocent because she’s greedy,hungry for fame and mney and of course, she has a very good appetite when it comes to black

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Donna Wood

Posted at 6:29 PM on May 10, 2012  

Vogue certainly doesn’t mind articles and pictures of Kim to help sell their advertising riddled rag. It’s an overpriced out of date rag.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Melanie

Posted at 3:05 PM on May 11, 2012  

Just like Kim’s body.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Val

Posted at 9:12 PM on May 9, 2012  

I’m sorry but the Met Ball are for those who have not only been in the big screen but who have TALENT….I’m glad Mrs. Wintour didn’t invite her, why should she!! She is the name in all fashion magazine …..beyond all our dreams!!
Not only does she get to overseas what comes in style for her next month issue…but Vogue was and will be one off the top fashion magazine in the world. Plus like I was saying TALENT…like Barbara Walters said to them….you don’t sing, you don’t ACT, you don’t have any TALENT (but be fame whore, and money hungry) plus ones you do porn it will follow you until the day you die kimmie!!
To many women on here nose is brown….how can you have her for a role model, someone who bashed marriage on tv and made a joke out of marriage values….please!! All she is good for is been a label whore and fame seeker. Nothing more and nothing less….so I’M glad she didn’t attend, made MET BALL so much fun this yr. My opinion….take it or leave…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Paige

Posted at 3:14 AM on May 10, 2012  

who said she wasnt invited?? what if she was! all of these so called “inside sources” are PHONY. ANNOYING. AND BIASED. Kim is BEAUTIFUL, her and kanye are cute together hop off it!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Melanie

Posted at 9:51 AM on May 10, 2012  

Who said she wasn’t invited? Clearly Anna Wintour, she just didn’t make a direct statement. It’s been said before that Anna doesn’t like Kim nor her family, so is it a lie? NO.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

nicole

Posted at 7:09 PM on May 9, 2012  

Sorry but kim is a whore no matter what kind of dress she wears or heavy her make up on her face and her body.

Hatershater001 you seem to be the one hating for not inviting a trash on the met.

Even kim hoe’s star as a porn starlet did not shine so why are so mad?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Rosalie

Posted at 6:04 PM on May 9, 2012  

Y……a slut and you’re a whore!! Kim’s way much better than you are, thats y my comment’s been removed!!!! bahahahaha

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Rosalie

Posted at 4:40 PM on May 9, 2012  

Anna your unprofessional, just because you hate Kim doesn’t mean that you have to banned her from that met ball or what ever!!!I don’t know Kim and her family but You know for sure that everyone here hates her and y not just let her be there!!! or is it because everyone just can’t stand that she’s better than all of yous here!!!! or R U PERFECT??!! (so pathetic), only if you’s look around you and see for yourself y r U judging the Kardashians so badly!!! all you haters are sucks!!! I wish the Kardashians the very best onwards!! There was a YESTURDAY and there is always a TOMORROW!! SO EVERYONE, COUNT ON IT!! Last but not the least, Kim and the Kardashians, LIVE YOUR LIFE TO THE FULLEST, coz GODS DOOR R ALWAYS OPEN TO US ALL

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ashley

Posted at 7:16 PM on May 9, 2012  

You seemed to be so mad for not inviting Kim Hoe to the met.

Kim is better than all of them? You must be dreaming.

Without the tons of heavy make up Kim Hoe is nothing but just an ordinary face.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

brenda

Posted at 10:42 PM on May 9, 2012  

wrong we have seen her without make up and she is a natural beauty. Why you are so jealous she is not a whore. Her trusted boyfriend wanted to make a buck and put that out there. She made it when young and in Love which was stupid but does not make her a whore. She has had relationships but I havent seen her putting herself out there for bank. I disagree about their talent they are entainers and model’s who have a huge following so they cant sing or dance so what that does not make a star a star is more than talent.
babs walters Pleaseeee She should of stepped out of the public eye way back. Cant stand her

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

@Rosalie

Posted at 9:53 AM on May 10, 2012  

Stop preaching girl. She didn’t get invited, end of story. No need for you to type an essay on the topic.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

melanie

Posted at 4:21 PM on May 9, 2012  

You guys are idiots. She had a photo shoot for a European magazine booked MONTHS in advance. I’m sure she wanted to ditch it & go but she didn’t because it would be unprofessional. But i guess reporting the more scandalous story from a BS tabloid that makes stuff up like you is more fun.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

hatershater001

Posted at 5:17 PM on May 9, 2012  

lol AGREEEE!! shes invited to THE OSCARS, GOLDEN GLOBES, AND GRAMMYS? but the Met ball, shes BANNNNED!!! People are such idiots for believing everything they hear

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

melanie

Posted at 5:44 PM on May 9, 2012  

I know. She even went to the dinner at the white house, but the MET gala is higher than that? Ok

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

TNT

Posted at 5:58 PM on May 9, 2012  

Only reason she went to the white house was because fox news invited her. So did Lindsey Lohan. She was the butt of some harsh jokes. It is about time Someone is standing up to them. I guess E does not rule everyone. I am positive, if she could have went, she would have moved heaven and earth to attend this year. I am glad a Anna detest her and see what she has done to Kris H was horrific. I can not understand why people, adults are defending what this family had done? This could have been anyone of our sons taken in and used for ratings? I guess money trumps treating someone with dignity. Even the Simmons Family is defending the Kardashians. That is the world we live in. America has lost its grace.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

melanie

Posted at 9:43 PM on May 9, 2012  

What is your point? I’m saying she is allowed at the WC so why would the MET ban her. She could’ve went with her boyfriend. She didn’t need an invite.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Gina

Posted at 9:44 PM on May 9, 2012  

What she did to Kris? is what you think she did to Kris. No one knows what really happened.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

V

Posted at 3:50 AM on May 10, 2012  

You had to be on a list to get in. No one could just pop up. Tight security.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

nicole

Posted at 7:19 PM on May 9, 2012  

So what if kim Hoe was invited on all those affairs that you mentioned?

Met did not invite her so accept it.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

melanie

Posted at 9:45 PM on May 9, 2012  

Maybe you should learn that tabloid articles are not fact.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

mvk

Posted at 2:53 PM on May 9, 2012  

I would have thought less of the ball and Anna if they had invited a slut. I don’t care how “pretty” she would have looked or how expensive her dress would have been. Trash is still trash.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Jessica

Posted at 3:11 PM on May 9, 2012  

Agree!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

mboomer

Posted at 2:27 PM on May 9, 2012  

Kim does not belong with real talented stars. She is a star but not the right kind ‘a porn star’ no matter what dress she wears, what hair and makeup she has, she is porn big time and that will stay with her for the restant of her life. The tape will not go away. THe more she poses in every different places in a porny way, in bondage boots or sexy lingerie, she is porn and that is why she has followers on twiter that does not translate to buyers it translate to people wanting to see her porny face. MB

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 3:14 PM on May 9, 2012  

i like that you get the idea that it’s about buyers, and that porn is one of the biggest markets out there! but, mostly, i like your use of “porny face”… that ranks up there for me with “pig slut” (RHOBH, Kim Richards quote)

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

TRUTH

Posted at 1:26 AM on May 10, 2012  

‘Porny face’ lol! kim just go a new nickname.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

hatershater001

Posted at 1:53 PM on May 9, 2012  

I doubt this story is true, but it actually would have been nice to see her there…Fame Whore aside lol, she has great style…and a great body. She is all about fashion, so it was weird that she wouldnt be invited. Love her or hate her, she build a fashion empire. and if Paris Hilton has been on the cover of Vogue twice being the idiot that she is, Anna Wintour has no excuse not to put kim on her cover. She sells! point blank. Hate her all you want, she will sell your magazine. She is a truly stunning woman, with a shitty personality. And i bet if she was at the Gala, she would have stole the spotlight liek she usually does everytime she walks a carpet. Sorry, but its the truth

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

SMH

Posted at 3:49 PM on May 9, 2012  

You obviously are just as shallow has Kimtrashian. Kimtrashian did not belong because she is a D-LISTER.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

SMH

Posted at 3:51 PM on May 9, 2012  

Not everyone on her twitter are her fans!!!

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Melanie

Posted at 4:21 PM on May 9, 2012  

If you follow her & arent a fan, you’re a moron.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

hatershater001

Posted at 5:14 PM on May 9, 2012  

LMAOOOO if you follow her on twitter and hate her…you are an idiot. If you click on articles with her name and hate her….you are idiot.

seems like both shoes fit in your case…idiot

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

nicole

Posted at 7:02 PM on May 9, 2012  

Sorry but kim is whore no matter what kind of dress she wears or heavy her make up on her face and her body.

Hatershater001 you seem to be the one hating for not inviting a trash on the met.

Even kim hoe’s star as a porn starlet did not shine so why are so mad?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

nicole

Posted at 7:25 PM on May 9, 2012  

It seems to be so hard for you to understand why KIm Whore was not invited to the met.

You must be a crazy fan of the trash!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lisa

Posted at 11:31 PM on May 9, 2012  

Actually, your right. She would have stole the show but in a negative way. She would have worn a dress with her nipples almost hanging out like she did at the pre-Grammy party. (Where she wore the blue gown) Or she would have worn something so tight on her azz that all the pics and articles that night would have been about Kim Kardashian’s privates. She would have made sure she had some Kim friendly paparazzi around to take nonstop photos of her. Then she would have sniveled around some real A-List stars or designers and request that her picture be taken with them so she can prove that she really does fit in. Then some down-on-their-luck ex-PETA member paid by Kartrashian Inc. would throw flour on her so everyone could feel sorry for her and say she was right to divorce Kris after 72 days. The Met ball is about art, fashion and culture. Kim does not represent any of that. But if it makes you feel any better, she did get invited to the Us Weekly Hot Hollywood Party.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

okenesha

Posted at 1:41 PM on May 9, 2012  

Kim is always trying to be important am glad Anna Wintour did not see any reason why she had to attend she is still Mrs. Humphries not Mrs. Kanye plus she is a D Lister.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

hatershater001

Posted at 1:56 PM on May 9, 2012  

D-listers dont have 15 million people following them on twitter…your opinion is your opinion, but she is an A-LIST celebrity. Just for the wrong reasons

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

marge

Posted at 7:29 PM on May 9, 2012  

Anybody can post on twitter. You do not need to be a celebrity to have followers.

15 M followers do not translate to fans ok?

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Real

Posted at 11:16 PM on May 9, 2012  

Actually, you’re wrong. A-Listers are the most revered of celebrities and have accolades to prove their success. Like winning an Oscar, Tony or Grammy. A Listers get top billing in movies. Whether you like them or not, here are some A-Lister: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Meryl Streep, Rita Moreno, Denzel Washington, Mariah Carey, Oprah Winfrey, Robert DeNiro, Clint Eastwood etc.. Get the idea? Kartrashian does not fit in. She is a porn star and a reality tv personality. Having a lot of Twitter followers just means you have a lot to say and a lot of nitwits to follow you. Hitler had a lot of people following him but he never would have been on the A-List. And money isn’t everything. Larry Flynt, Bernie Madoff and Leona Helmsley had a lot of money but that did not make them A-Listers.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

TRUTH

Posted at 1:17 AM on May 10, 2012  

Most A-list celebs shun kk and ban her from their circle of friends. That makes her a wannabe a-list celeb.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lisa

Posted at 1:39 PM on May 9, 2012  

Even though Radar Online is a suspect source, I believe this story because Kim lives for attention & would have killed to be at the Met Gala. She didn’t even attend her sister’s baby shower in order to go to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and Im suppose to believe that the decision not to go was her own? Hmmm, no.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Tricia

Posted at 1:14 PM on May 9, 2012  

Please!!! Radar Online is who made this claim, need I say more?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

So Glad

Posted at 12:17 PM on May 9, 2012  

I’m so glad Kim wasn’t invited and even more glad that Anna Wintour hates the kardashians! They are all so fake, an only belong on relaity tv if anything. They don’t measure up anywhere even near real celebrities!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

common sense

Posted at 9:27 AM on May 9, 2012  

Who cares. I did wonder why she was missing. That explains it… Ah well just shows that Kim is just like the rest of us. we weren’t invited either lol

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Ladonda West

Posted at 9:07 AM on May 9, 2012  

Invite a trick azz ho to high society function!…Kick her skank azz to the curb where she belongs with the rest of the trash!….plastic pig faced skank!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sheila

Posted at 1:15 PM on May 9, 2012  

then I guess half of the people that were there should not have been, because hollywood is nothing but ho’s shall we count how many times each of them have swapped mates?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Gina

Posted at 5:43 PM on May 9, 2012  

SERIOUSLY!!

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cherokeevirg

Posted at 1:27 PM on May 9, 2012  

I love your comment. I could not have said that any better.
I can’t stand that Fake Piece of Trash.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 2:59 PM on May 9, 2012  

add me to the list of your fans… and, i like your style. :) i do think kim is best described as a trick-azz-ho. as well, her mom…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sara

Posted at 9:02 AM on May 9, 2012  

I puke again everytime I see actical abt this stupid kardashian!!! God plz stop this madness !!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Melanie

Posted at 8:49 AM on May 9, 2012  

Why should she be invited? Just because she’s dating Kanye? Anna threw the party, which means she could invite and not invite whoever she wants. If she dislikes Kim, then it is what it is. But Kim would’ve surely come out with a statement saying that she couldn’t make it because of business, had this story about Anna not come out.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

nicole

Posted at 7:32 PM on May 9, 2012  

I agree. I always have a party in the house and only invite those that I like.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Lisa

Posted at 8:46 AM on May 9, 2012  

Fake tabloid article from radar which is like you guys in terms of accuracy & BS

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,907 other followers