Taylor Armstrong's 'Housewives' Role Cut — She May Quit Show

Thu, March 29, 2012 4:24pm EST by 20 Comments
Taylor Armstrong Housewives

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

dd

Posted at 8:08 AM on December 18, 2012  

Fire Taylor Armstrong, she not interesting, I turn down the sound eveytime she is on screen. As for Kim, really remove her. She is soo tired.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Natasha

Posted at 10:50 AM on April 22, 2012  

What the hell… You don’t know if you are coming or going… Therefore both of your remarks are I significant cause you don’t know what you are raving on about… So suck it up and zip it up if you don’t know what the yells is going on in anyone’s lives… Check your own life out first.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Jeannie

Posted at 12:04 PM on March 30, 2012  

Bravo and dear Andy do not have the balls to show Taylor the door. If she’s so desperate for money she could try the employment office, read the newspaper help wanted ads or take her resume to various employers. Why does she think she needs to continue the life style she enjoyed while driving her husband to suicide? I’m not watching again even if she’s only a minor player because she won’t be content with that; she will have to create some drama where she is the center of attention once again. Sorry, Bravo, too little, too late.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Madeline

Posted at 1:40 AM on March 30, 2012  

Kim isn’t one of my favorites, but I could handle watching her get her life back on track. She might be fun when she’s not so stoned. However, as for Taylor? Not a chance in hell I’d watch that lying train wreck again. OY vey! What a nasty piece of work. What will she NOT do for fame?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Rosebud

Posted at 1:34 AM on March 30, 2012  

Time to boycott. All bravo needs to do is show that skank and I’m seriously turning the channel never to watch it again.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Linda

Posted at 6:58 PM on March 29, 2012  

I am with you! If Taylor is on even one time……that is one time too many for me!
Bravo doesn’t need to “phase” this witch out! Honestly, I will, as many others, boycott both Bravo and Every Bravo Sponsor if her ugly face is in any scene of the next season!
Bravo, get it right this time-lasy seadon was a disaster!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Yes!!!!!

Posted at 6:48 PM on March 29, 2012  

Don’t know if any of this is true, but I HOPE so!!! Taylor needs to go!!!! Way too much drama and LYING on her part. And frankly she needs to focus on her daughter. Kim can chill with fam. So, this is GREAT news if true!!! Bring on NEW fun story lines!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Minella Darwin

Posted at 6:47 PM on March 29, 2012  

Dear HollywoodLife,

I was wrong to post such a filthy lie about a man I do not know. I was wrong to suggest that Taylor is being truthful in any way, shape, or form. I was very muddled in my thinking when I shot off that misguided comment. I want all readers to know that Randy Edwards has an impeccable reputation, and is by and large considered to be an authority on the life of his very good friend, Mr. Russel Armstrong. Unlike myself, who has NEVER met any of the parties about whom I’ve remarked. What I have seen of Taylor is really very ugly, in her words, her actions, and her deeds. I hope some form of justice meets her in this life. I truly hope she gets what she deserves, whatever that may be.

Thank YOu

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Minella Darwin

Posted at 9:21 PM on March 29, 2012  

Too bad i didnt write ^ THAT. lmao Look at Randy trying to cover it up hahahaha

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Minella Darwin

Posted at 6:22 PM on March 29, 2012  

Dear HollywoodLife,

Russell Armstrongs childhood friend Randy Edwards is publishing a tell-all book on Russell And Taylors relationship according to his twitter page early this march when he posted a tweet: “Going to meet with publishers friday” and he has constantly told his followers that they will know more about the relationship,in his words, “very soon”. Randy has only met Taylor twice, and according to her friends, he continues to bash Taylor publicly, Taylor barely remembers him and rarely acknowledged him when he was around, and according to friends he barely even called or hanged with them to even know their entire situation. Randy lives 1,000 miles away in Dallas. Russell would send him money and his sister money a few times, and now that Russell is gone, Randy needs his own money to survive. He is selling everything. From his own made-up “stories” to further cause Taylor and Kennedy harm, and to selling his gym equipment online. He constantly cyber bullies Taylor and Kennedy on twitter. Randy tells his followers that he “hurts” from Russells death every day, yet he’s about to make some blood money off of his friends death, and doesn’t care who he hurts along the way. He bashes Taylor for not thinking of Russells children when she wrote the book, yet he didn’t even think of them when he met with publishers for a tell-all over a relationship he barely knew. Taylor doesn’t pay attention to Randy, because her friends thinks he’s in it for fame and attention, since he was barely around when Russell was alive, and Taylors friends have never heard of him until now. He hanged with them twice last year(superbowl,and june when they went there for taylors bday) . He only knew 5 minutes of the relationship, but claims he knows more which makes no sense since he only saw the happy side of Russell & Taylor. He needs to be put to a stop, he’s out for revenge against Taylor since Russell isnt alive and doesn’t care about the kids. I get that Taylor wrote a book that shows a bad side of Russell, but that’s not to intentionally hurt the kids, she was telling the truth, and to help save other lives as well. She has volunteered at DV shelters, hosted DV events, created a DV foundation. She has showed she cares for DV victims. Period. Randy has not, he’s in it to be the “voice of russell” according to him,but where was he when the abuse claims first came out in July when Russell was STILL alive? Thats the question we should all ask.

Thank you:)

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

soso-koba

Posted at 6:40 PM on March 29, 2012  

uh, NO SHE WAS NOT TELLING THE TRUTH!!! DERRR come on man! WTF?? if shana doesn’t pay russell’s friend any attention, WHY ARE YOU?? you are not being honest with your comment. in fact you are flat out lying, or you are woefully misinformed. why the hell would you bring randy edwards name into this story? you must want to discredit him because he is going to expose the merry widow for the evil, conniving SHE-DEVIL LIAR we all know her to be!! you know less than nothing about russell armstrong OR randy edwards, and what you think you know about shana hughes sipes taylor ford armstrong, is only what SHE WANTS YOU TO THINK, and not even a shell of semblance of the truth. quite trying to smear dung on the grave of a deceased family man. that’s quite vile of you ms darwin

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Mel

Posted at 6:46 PM on March 29, 2012  

@ Minella Darwin — Haha you are so funny!!!! How do you know so much about what Randy is doing, this article is not even about him Taylor is a LIAR!!!!!! Her and the word truth do not belong together and looking at her “friends” Jennifur and Dwight, they seem to be liars too!!!! HAHAHA

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Fiona

Posted at 8:55 PM on March 29, 2012  

Are you ever delusional! You must be Shana or Dana or one of Bravo’s paid pr persons.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jams

Posted at 6:14 PM on March 29, 2012  

It’s time to clean house, new women who really work.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

stalina

Posted at 6:10 PM on March 29, 2012  

let’s be honest here. taylor would NEVER quit this show, or turn away ANY chance to be on television. she has proven that she will sell out anyone and any principle just to have her new name in the media.
if her appearances on RHBH are minimized, and ultimately cease altogether, it IS NOT OF HER CHOICE it will be because bravo has FINALLY determined her to be the off-the-rails-mad mendacious viper that she is. by the way, Camille shouldn’t be mentioned in the same breath as shana, as Camille is an authentic, thoughtful mother of two, and a perfect example of what a lady should be. THAT’S why Camille isn’t coming back to that back-stabbing liars paradise of a tv show.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Peaches

Posted at 5:55 PM on March 29, 2012  

Hope she is gone for good. It was disgusting to watch an old lady going braless and her t*tt*es bouncing down around her knees. In addition to her duck lips,, isn’t there any pretty housewives in Beverly Hills?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

cali

Posted at 5:16 PM on March 29, 2012  

Taylor not coming back is music to my ears!!!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

NO TAYLOR

Posted at 5:00 PM on March 29, 2012  

Bravo is trying to walk a fine line – less Taylor, hoping that we won’t boycott. Nice try, Miss Andy, but if Taylor is on at all, I’m gone.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 4:35 PM on March 29, 2012  

ps- i can see why taylor covers that body up most of the time. SO SO SO SO painfully ugly and thin. she is the poster child for healthy eating b/c being that thin ages you so dramatically! tho, in honesty, i never believed she was the age she claimed to be. i think she’s a full decade older than what she claims. look at those SCARY legs. eeek.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 4:32 PM on March 29, 2012  

yay… maybe kim will be on probation. maybe bravo realized the backlash from people disgusted at them taking advantage of the drama surrounding such unhealthy people (kim and taylor). i’d love if they got rid of kyle, too- but i don’t think that’s going to happen. boo… if she managed to pull in some more people connected to her family (the hiltons), she’s going to get more air time. she’s either boring, tho, or annoying— no middle ground. not sure what she’ll do without taylor tho. and lisa is over her. i’ve never seen her be able to stand on her own or be at all interesting by herself— so, i’m curious how she’ll remain on this show given her bore factor. maybe they’ll finally cut her in one more year… one can hope.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,372 other followers