Russell Brand Could Make $20 Million From Divorce To Katy Perry

Tue, January 3, 2012 8:45am EDT by 4 Comments
Russell Brand 20 Million

Russell revealed last year that he and Katy did not have a prenup and that means he could take up to half of her $44 million dollar fortune — do you think that’s fair?

Russell Brand could become a very rich man. A shocking new report claims that Russell and Katy Perry did not have a prenuptial agreement, which means he could potentially be entitled to half or even more of his soon-to-be ex-wife’s fortune!

Although Katy and Russell were married in a lavish ceremony in India in 2010, they were also married in California. The state of California is a community property state, which means that couples must split their earnings down the middle — 50/50.

Forbes reports that Katy is worth $44 million, and Russell is reportedly worth around $15 million, meaning he could take over $20 million of her fortune.

HollywoodLife.com told you that although reports claim Russell and Katy had been fighting for months, Katy did not want to give up on the marriage. We also told you that Katy is leaning on her best friend Rihanna during the devastating split and a source tells The Sun that Russell shockingly didn’t approve of his wife’s friendship with the singer. Why? Because their hard partying ways together was difficult for the former heroin and sex addict.

Russell also reportedly wanted children with Katy while she wanted to wait until her career settled down.

“I’m doing good,” Russell told the London’s Daily Star over the weekend. “Everything is going to be better next year.”

— Chloe Melas

Loading video...

More Katy:

  1. Katy Perry Didn’t Want To Divorce Russell Brand
  2. Russell Brand Files For Divorce From Katy Perry
  3. Katy Perry Doesn’t Have Time To Feed Russell Brand’s ‘Big Ego,’ Says Insider

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

Marx

Posted at 3:29 PM on January 3, 2012  

Why would you think it is unfair? For decades we have seen women repeatedly being handed fortunes earned by men, and no one bothered asking “is it fair?” then.. it was only men losing out on their hard-earned money. Now a useless ‘popstar’ female stands to be treated as an equal by losing money in a divorce, and you suddenly worry about it being fair?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Katarina

Posted at 3:53 PM on January 5, 2012  

She partied knowing that her husband was a recovering drug addict.Selfish twatt!I hope he does take her for 20 million.Obviously her vows to LOVE ,HONOR and CHERISH meant nothing to her.Im glad he left her he is the better man for it.She is dirt.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anna

Posted at 2:14 PM on January 3, 2012  

i think its fair. it was their decision and now katy has to be responsible and pay for it

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

kk

Posted at 9:07 AM on January 3, 2012  

my friend
is a 27 years old doctor,mature and beautiful. and now she is seeking a good man who can give her real love, so she got a sername Andromeda2002 on Agedate.СòM, a nice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and younger men, to interact with each other.Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter
Next ARTICLE
ALL NEWS
PREV ARTICLE
ALL NEWS