The animal rights organization has zeroed in on the two stars in the past, but now both Kim and Janet have come under fire once again! Do you agree or do you think they’re picking on the stars?
About a year ago PETA zeroed in on Janet Jackson after she designed a fur collection for Blackglama — and now they’re back to slamming the star, ‘awarding’ her the first-ever ‘PETA Grinch of the Year‘ title stating, “When Janet Jackson had her infamous “wardrobe malfunction” during the Super Bowl, at least the flesh that popped into view was her own—unlike the stolen animal skins that she drapes herself with, which are as dead as her taste in fashion (not to mention her career). Ms. Jackson, you’re just plain nasty.” While the organization means well, does slamming and shaming stars really work?
Also on the list was Kim Kardashian, who recently came under attack a few months ago. PETA stated, “Some have speculated that Kim Kardashian’s wedding to NBA forward Kris Humphries was fake. Too bad the socialite princess doesn’t have the same enthusiasm for faking her fur. Unlike her sweet sister Khloe, who starred in her own PETA anti-fur ad, Kim just can’t seem to divorce herself from fur and say “I do” to a kind and kompassionate wardrobe.”
While I definitely understand where PETA is coming from,the fact that they’re blatantly attacking stars with harsh comments doesn’t seem like an effective method for the cause they’re fighting. I don’t know about you, but I think their time, energy and resources are better spent educating individuals, not slamming stars — simply because it doesn’t look like it’s leading to any change, and that’s the ultimate goal. Do you agree?