Baby Lisa Irwin: The Mysterious Cell Phone Call Connected To The Case! Video!

Thu, November 10, 2011 12:32pm EST by 7 Comments
Lisa Irwin Cell Phone

Lisa Irwin Cell Phone

This woman received a strange phone call the night baby Lisa went missing — from one of the phones stolen from the house! Is there a connection?

The night baby Lisa Irwin disappeared, Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin say three cell phones also went missing. In an intriguing twist, police say a 50-second phone call was made from one of the missing phones. But Deborah and Jeremy say that’s totally impossible — the phones were disconnected! This case keeps getting stranger and stranger!
Police have interviewed Megan Wright about the phone call she received, according to KCTV5. She lived a mile away from the family, but says she doesn’t know them at all.

“I didn’t have my phone at the time, but apparently there was a 50-second phone call from one of the family’s phones to my cell phone,” she explained. “I don’t know what was said or who called or who answered my phone, but that’s what the police have been questioning me about.”

So where WAS the phone? Megan says she shares it with seven other people she lives with, which is why she has no idea who answered the call. But apparently the call was made between 8 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. — which was about two hours after Deborah says she last saw Lisa!

But Megan might be connected to the case more than just a mysterious call…

She used to date a neighborhood handyman known as “Jersey” that police have questioned regarding the case. “He’s an ex-boyfriend of mine,” Megan revealed. “We dated for about five months. He was just a friend of a friend.” She said that they broke up a few weeks before Lisa went missing!

She said “Jersey” often went door-to-door looking for work, so it was possible that he might have stopped by Jeremy and Deborah’s home before. Police have spoken to “Jersey,” but he’s been cleared.

This case has so many twists and turns! First, Deborah changes her story and revealed she was drunk that night. Then, neighbors saw a mysterious man in the area holding a baby. And now this!

What do YOU think is going on, HollyMoms? Is the strange handyman connected? Was it Deborah? Share your opinion in the comments!

-Anna Moeslein

More on the case:

  1. Lisa Irwin’s Parents Are Hurting The Investigation, Attorney Says!
  2. Attorneys Cancel Interviews With Lisa Irwin’s Brothers!
  3. Baby Lisa Irwin: Investigators Are Interviewing Her Brothers Again!

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

信頼 スタンドカラージャケット 人気

Posted at 11:30 AM on November 9, 2013  

Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative.
I am going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in
future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 5:49 AM on November 18, 2011  

i think that the mother did it…the father once said when asked by the police who he thinks would kidnapp a baby, that a woman who cheated on her husband could do it…so i think that he found out that lisa wasnt his, he got into an argument with deborah and threatend to leave her and left for work…the mum was sad, the baby could have cried, she lost it and killed her probably by accident…i dont think that they can find that little cutie alive ….

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 10:21 AM on November 12, 2011  

i think it was the ex boyfriend

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 1:25 PM on November 11, 2011  

The mom did it

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 1:45 PM on November 10, 2011  

The phone call was made at 11:57pm, not around 8:30pm or 2:30am. The phone had restricted use which means any outgoing number was rerouted. The recipient doesn’t get the call, customer care does. Megan Wright agreed with both the 2:30am and the 8:30pm times. Maybe she does too many drugs and can’t remember what she said before? People who don’t do drugs don’t usually hang out with people who do. Where did this Dane guy come from? Why didn’t she mention him before it was learned her phone wasn’t for community use. And Dane just happened to have her phone on October 3 and 4. What a coincidence. Maybe someone should check into that house where Megan Wright lives. 3 children live there and she admits there is drug use going on. A family member coming forward saying Deborah Bradley “flirted with drugs”? Why didn’t they come forward before? Shane? Why didn’t he say anything before? Wouldn’t the neighbor who was there (Samantha Brando) have mentioned him? Shane and Dane in one day? Give me a break. I am not supplying a link. Some of you need to learn how to look up facts before you post gibberish so google it.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Wayne M

Posted at 4:57 PM on November 10, 2011  

This case is stranger than fiction. I have googled the time of the cell phone and continue to get 3 different times. Do you have a definitive source for 11:57 PM?

Wonder why the time changed so much?

Here in Florida, they could probably find the location of the cellphone when the call was made but I guess they can’t do there. That could be huge.

I am not judgmental so I am staying out of “whodunnit” until a jury decides. I hope they will get this solved and they find that baby alive.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Sharon Jeanguenat

Posted at 1:11 PM on November 10, 2011  

Either the mom is lying, or dad snuck home from work, & took the baby, or else mom is telling the truth. But, unless they find the baby, or the body, or evidence somewhere that proves something, we will probably never know for sure.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter