Amanda Knox's Day With Her Sister — She Loves Normal Life!

Mon, October 17, 2011 9:36am EDT by 19 Comments
Amanda Knox Pics

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

John

Posted at 10:13 AM on November 2, 2011  

Nothing foxy about this ho. Looks like she got hit with a two by four. She’s a fat buttaface.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Brian J

Posted at 2:54 PM on October 20, 2011  

I’m glad she is enjoying life. Makes you wonder how many innocent people the prosecutor has put in jail. One victim of the prosecutor recently won a multi million dollar lawsuit against his office. Must be getting expensive for the town of Perugia to afford the prosecutor’s delusional satanically inspired inquisitions. Hope the George Clooney movie about the Monster of Florence is made soon and in theaters 2012.
At least the real killer of the victim is behind bars in this case, Rudy Guede. Albeit at a reduced sentence of 16 years for providing false testimony against the 2 recently cleared defendants.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anonymous

Posted at 8:48 AM on October 19, 2011  

At least her sister has a cute face, Amanda Knox is just a butt ugly skank.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John Winters

Posted at 9:54 PM on October 20, 2011  

Jealousy badly becomes you

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anna

Posted at 4:07 PM on October 17, 2011  

Sorry. Not ignorant or an idiot and still think she’s innocent. No evidence. Not one shred. And yes I read the court documents that have been disproved. Plus, if you read the comments from enough message boards, you’ll see that a lot of people in Italy and the UK agree that she is innocent. But the question was will she be able to live a normal life. I think so but only when the paparazzi stops following her around. Let’s do that. K?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John

Posted at 11:37 AM on October 17, 2011  

Why still give her attention? She more than likely knowss more than she’s letting on, and America is the only country that believes in her innocence. Both Itlay, France, and England believe that she is guilty. Only America believes her cause of her parents campaign on all the talk shows they forced themselves on. Even if you think she is innocent, she’s still a lying, accusing, drug using, party girl who shouldn’t be getting all the money offers and attention she’s been getting. She wasn’t a very nice young girl. Hopefully, one day, she’ll answer to God and he’ll decide her true fate.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Jay

Posted at 11:58 AM on October 17, 2011  

You know you’re not a very smart person right? You can’t string together an even remotely correct sentence on a message board. You have no idea how to analyze evidence. Let’s hope no one ever puts you on a jury. Idiot!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anonymous

Posted at 8:49 AM on October 19, 2011  

You’re an impotent twit.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Dee

Posted at 2:35 PM on October 17, 2011  

The money making racket is really beyond her control. Marriott, the PR firm who is spreading all the propoganda and nonsense has to be paid.
I wouldn’t worry about people in the USA believing she is innocent – you have to be practically retarded to fall for that. The vast majority of intelligent folks can reason for themselves.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John Winters

Posted at 4:22 PM on October 17, 2011  

The reason that Americans think Amanda Knox is not guilty is because just prior to her case, they had gone through a very similar case with the 3 students from the Duke College Lacrosse team who were accused of rape. For a long time, everyone found it hard to believe they were innocent even though there was not a shred of DNA evidence to support the accusation. This is exactly what is happening in Amanda’s case. It will take tome for all the morons to work out that the application of scientific principles proved her innocence a long time ago.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 6:45 PM on October 17, 2011  

i don’t understand why people don’t get the simple notion that she was not found INNOCENT— all they found is that the evidence did not support her guilt. there is a big difference. they only found that they couldn’t prove she had anything to do with it. that does not mean she didn’t do it, of course. there were a lot of fishy things in her stories and behavior, and it’s far from cut and dry. anyone that thinks they know the answer, is as arrogant as a 16 year old who thinks they’ve figured the world out.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

John Winters

Posted at 10:52 PM on October 17, 2011  

gbtw said: ”i don’t understand why people don’t get the simple notion that she was not found INNOCENT— all they found is that the evidence did not support her guilt. there is a big difference”

The verdict that came in at Amanda’s appeal hearing was a category 530 verdict in Italian law. It stipulates that the prosecution case against Amanda had signally failed to prove that she had anything to do with the killing and that beyond a reasonable doubt, (in Judge Hellman’s own words), ”Amanda Knox was completely innocent.” I can understand why people who fell for and believed in the prosecution team’s inept efforts to convict Amanda effectively back in 2009, and who have since had FOUR YEARS to intensify and deepen those beliefs, must be feeling pretty bitter at this moment since their faith in the prosecution case has just been summarily sunk; rather like the German people who believed the big lie back in the thirties must have felt in ’45. But hey, you’ll get over it.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 6:43 PM on October 18, 2011  

thanks for quoting the law to me— that under their law they actually use that terminology, “innocent”. but the fact is, they just found that they didn’t have enough evidence of the guilt. as an intellectual matter, not just semantics, i don’t believe she proved her innocence or that they found that— e.g., with undeniable proof that she was somewhere else or something like that. so, though i suppose you’re right on semantics, i don’t believe that she was freed b/c they found something (an alibi) that made it impossible for her to have done this. the story is still fishy, and reasonable minds could certainly differ over her guilt (which, would have let her get off in this country, too, just under a different process).

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anonymous

Posted at 9:42 PM on October 25, 2011  

You’re as dumb as they come. You probably in Adam and Eve.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Julia

Posted at 12:46 PM on October 23, 2011  

Well, gee, John. You really think that all of Italy, France and England think she’s guilty? Wow … you must have great connections and good spies. Either way, I’m from Germany (a country you haven’t listed), and I (as well as many others) happen to think she’s completely, utterly and totally innocent. Since you simply presume to know that she “wasn’t a very nice young girl”, I hope that one day, you’ll be judged in the same harsh manner by an ignorant person who doesn’t have a CLUE about you.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Kathy

Posted at 11:32 AM on October 17, 2011  

This girl is clearly guilty. I followed the case for three years and read every single court document that I had to translate myself. People don’t take the time to truly read the documents and pay attention to the trial. Sad for the Kerchers. Rest in Peace Meredith.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Tom

Posted at 9:55 AM on October 20, 2011  

Well then, you’re not a very smart person. Make sure you bring copies of your message board posted when you’re called for jury duty. You’re sure to get a dismissal based on idiocy.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Julia

Posted at 12:53 PM on October 23, 2011  

The girl is clearly innocent. And anyone who’s followed the case for three years and still thinks she’s guilty must haven an IQ way below 70 or suffer from attention deficit disorder.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anonymous

Posted at 9:43 PM on October 25, 2011  

You were obviously present at the villa at the time.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,719 other followers