Amanda Knox Juror Interview: We KNEW She Wasn’t A Murderer!

Those witnessing the case said they didn’t believe for a minute that Amanda was guilty — we’re so glad she’s free!

Amanda Knox is now safely in Seattle after winning an appeal in the Italian murder case which derailed her life. Now jurors are speaking out about their time on the case, saying they were shocked she was imprisoned for so long for a crime she clearly didn’t commit!

Amanda, 24, was convicted in 2009 for the 2007 killing of her roommate Meredith Kercher, but she was cleared of the crimes in Italian court along with her ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito. Juror Mauro Chialli said there was no doubt of their innocence through the appeal trial, Italy’s state-run RAI television reports.

“I saw the faces of these two kids, and they couldn’t bluff,” he said. “They didn’t bluff. My point of view is that these kids weren’t guilty. They weren’t there.”

What do you think, HollywoodLifers — do you agree with the verdict the jurors reached?

– William Earl

Loading video...

More Amanda Knox

View Comment

Amanda raped and killed her roommate, living out her twisted fantasy. Amanda should be shunned for she is a pariah.

Share this comment at

Dear LittleMo, actually Mignini investigated a very complicated case before the Kercher: a number of double homicides prepetrated in Tuscany. Due to a number of facts he suspected that behind the killer/s hid some politician and begun investigate. Of course some fat cat didn’t like his approch, and he got accused of abuse of power (nothing to do with manipulating evidences) and got convicted in first grade. He’s probably going to be found not guilty in the second grade of the trial cause the policemen that were accused along with him weren’t found guilty. I’d think that if someone gets his/her troath cut he/she will die quickly, I’m no doctor. How did Amanda know it took Meredith forever to die?

Leda? Dumber than doggie doo-doo. The prosecutor has a history of being charged with corruption of cases to get convictions even if the defendants are innocent to pad his conviction record. In Italy the substance used to detect blood is a pink color – that is what you saw, not “blood” all over that bathroom. Measurements were taken of the big toe on the footprint found near Meredith’s body felt to be from a man’s foot and compared against a measurement taken of Raffaele’s big toe. Not only did they NOT MATCH, they weren’t even close, i.e. it WAS NOT his foot that made that foot print. Amanda’s DNA on the knife handle – well, it was a kitchen knife found in the kitchen of the apartment where Amanda lived and cooked meals – I would think Amanda’s DNA would be on everything in that apartment – after all, she did live there. Amanda did nothing to anyone.

Where is your proof? The so-called DNA on the knife turned out to be rye bread residue – Italian police couldn’t tell the difference between rye bread and human DNA? The “blood” in the bathroom and the rest of the crime scene is actually the substance Italian police use to detect blood and that substance is pink in color – there was no “massive blood” in that apartment. It took them 6 WEEKS to find the clasp to the bra and then on camera you could actually see dirt on the gloves that handled so-called evidence yet you want to call that reliable? These 2 young people didn’t do anything to anybody.

@dumas1000…well, that man that committed the crime SINGLE-HANDEDLY, my friend, that man USED TWO KNIVES!!! Ever seen a killer switch knive? Also Guede did not recive a reduction of the sentence (by one third) becuase he implicated Amanda and Raffaele: he recived it because he chosed a type of trial that is faster not involving a jury…and so that you know, this type of trial doesn’t allow the presence of the press. EVERY defendant that asks this short trial gets the reduction of one third of the sentence and THE SENTENCE SAID THAT HE CONCURRED TO THE DEATH (giving the two knives)…but go on blaming it soley on the blak guy.

Amanda is guilty little pervert. Just like in the short story she wrote, her fantasy was to rape and kill another woman. Now the monster is free.

If Nancy Grace had heard that some woman had bullied and badgered some other woman in to committing suicide, Nancy would have immediately demanded justice for the bullied woman. Only it was Nancy who bullied that other woman to death, and she pretty admitted as much when she agreed to pay off a civil lawsuit filed by the deceased woman’s family. Only Nancy would have insisted that the perpetrator of this crime go straight to jail, if not for the fact that she is the one who perpetrated the the crime. Hypocrisy says hello. And it is Nancy here in America who is once against responsible for stoking the flames of intolerance, likely for no other reason the fact that this sort of sensationalism, where it is unjust or not, drives her precious ratings. The revenge prosecutor rides again.

A, this whole thing was the result of a delusional prosecutor with a documented history of corruption. B, the man who committed the crime single-handedly, whose DNA evidence was found all over the crime scene and who was convicted of the murder and is currently in prision recieved a reduced sentence for implicating Amanda Knox and her boyfriend in the crime. There is zero credible evidence against Knox and no tangible motive. All that occult garbage spewed by the prosecutor makes no sense and is beyond ridiculous. It looks someone around here has drank a little too much of the magical Nancy Grace Kool-aid. Side effects will include pretentious, sanctimonious, intolerant, unenlightened, hypocritical behavior.