If I’m not mistaken, Kim did marry Kris this past weekend on Aug. 20 — so why isn’t he featured along with his bride?
Does it seem weird to anyone else that Kim Kardashian posed for her wedding album in People without Kris Humphries?
A wedding is about a couple — meaning two. But Kim’s groom was left off the cover of the magazine that also boasts the headline “Kim’s Wedding Album!” Excuse me, did she marry herself?
Yes, Kim is more famous, but her celebrity has certainly made Kris a household name in the time they’ve been dating/engaged.
Kim, you should have insisted that Kris be with you on the cover — it’s insane to make that day all about yourself, especially when it’s really about the beginning of your life with Kris!
– Denise Warner
Click For More Of Kim’s Wedding!
- Kim Kardashian Wears THREE Glam Gowns On Her Wedding Day — Get All The Details & See A Pic Of Her Wedding Dress!
- Kim Kardashian’s Wild Wedding Reception Toasts: Khloe Tells Guests To ‘Shake Your T*ts’ On The Dance Floor!
- Kim Kardashian & Kris Humphries Are Married! Congratulations!
View Comment
lvb
Posted at 2:38 PM on August 25, 2011
Yes!! I love Kim, but I was shocked to see her on the cover by herself and no mention of Kris’ name!! This is not a good start to their marriage.
c
Posted at 1:25 PM on August 25, 2011
ELLIE
Posted at 11:57 AM on August 25, 2011
I CANNOT BELIEVE THE COVER OF THIS MAGAZINE. I READ WHERE IT WAS KIMS DAY THAT IS WHY SHE IS THE ONLY ONE IN THE PICTURE. COME ON PEOPLE, KRIS WAS THE GROOM AND IT WAS HIS
DAY ALSO AND HE DEFINITLEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THAT PICTURE.THAT COVER IS A JOKE.
Jessica Gable
Posted at 8:05 PM on August 28, 2011
Hope they had a prenup before saying I do…LOL! I like Kim, but I was shocked as well…I mean yes it’s more the Brides Day, but without the groom, there’s no wedding!!! I wonder how much People Magazine paid her to have just her photo on there?! Unless she didn’t tell him so she could keep all the money…CTFU