Rob Pattinson Is Praised & Slammed In 'Water For Elephants' Reviews — Are These Critics Too Mean?

Thu, April 21, 2011 1:17pm EST by 68 Comments

Robert Pattinson’s performance in Water for Elephants is getting mixed reviews! Will you go see the movie anyway, despite what the negative critics say?

We have all been anxiously awaiting seeing Robert Pattinson perform alongside Academy Award winners Christoph Waltz and Reese Witherspoon in Water for Elephants, and tomorrow the wait is over! Unfortunately, movie critics who have already seen the film have released their reviews and while some praise Rob as “entirely convincing”, others are calling him “woefully untalented”, “lifeless” and “dull”. Ouch! Are they being too harsh?

Critics are very split on whether Rob’s performance and the movie itself are entertaining, or utterly boring. The Associated Press says “Witherspoon and Pattinson are a three-ring snooze-fest together”, calling Christoph the “lone attraction” who highlights how “dull” Reese and Rob are. They go as far as saying, “The movie is a long, long way from the greatest show on Earth; at best, it might be the greatest show in your local theater, assuming it’s the only film playing there.”

The Huffington Post is even crueler to Rob, completely panning him in their review. Not only do they call Rob “woefully untalented” they say the “dreadful” movie “rests on the head of the sleepy-eyed Pattinson, an actor so lifeless that you keep expecting someone to put a mirror to his nostrils. Oh wait – wrong movie.” The attack doesn’t stop there: “Pattinson had better hope that someone writes a whole bunch more of the Twilight novels because once those movies run out, his string as a movie star is probably up. He has no discernible talent as an actor, beyond a bedroom gaze that seems to express very little of what’s on his mind.” Can you believe it? Poor Rob!!

The Chicago Tribune is nicer in its review, saying the movie is “Like ‘The Notebook,’ but with an elephant.” The review attempts to compliment Rob while somehow simultaneously insulting him: “Waltz’s archetypal villain cannot help but steal focus when he’s on-screen, partly because of the abuse of which the character is capable, partly because Waltz is just so damned interesting to watch. That’s more than can be said for Pattinson, who is easy to take without having yet made a single surprising or provocative choice as an actor. Yet he, too, is at least in there working his two or three notes hard, and often effectively.” We think there was a compliment in there somewhere.

Moviehole is very positive about Rob’s performance, saying he matches Christoph and Reese “scene for scene.” “Who knew this kid could act?? Well done young man,” it proclaims.”

Finally, the Hollywood Reporter provides us comfort. “Looking 300 per cent better than he did in his last non-‘Twilight’ outing, ‘Remember Me,’ Pattinson is entirely convincing as Jacob, a Cornell veterinary school student who escapes from the ruin provoked by his parents’ untimely death by almost inadvertently joining the circus.’ Unfortunately they still think “the vital spark that would have made the drama truly compelling on the screen is missing.”

The reviews are still pouring in so there’s still a chance for more positive opinions. But we are shocked by how harsh these critics are towards the Hollywood heartthrob. Are you upset at their cruel comments? Are you going to see the movie despite what they say? And how do you predict Rob will be on film alongside Christoph and Reese? Sound off below!

Lorena O’Neil

Want more Rob?

  1. Click here for more on how madly in love Rob is with Kristen!
  2. Click here to see Rob being fan-friendly at WFE premiere!
  3. Click here for more on Rob and Kristen at the WFE after party!