Wow. Let’s just take a second to worship the hotness that is Justin Bieber.
The glorious picture above is the first look from Justin’s new campaign for G-Star Raw jean company. And if our boyfriends look anything like this while wearing those jeans, we’re sold!
Look at how buff he is! We just want to snuggle all weekend with him. We’re sure Selena Gomez will be framing this work of art!
nikki
Posted at 11:14 AM on February 20, 2011
This is horrible! If a male staff member wrote an article about a 16-17 year old girl’s “HOT underwear photo”, this would be a COMPLETELY different story!
Not to mention, blogs rip apart celebrities like Kim K for having crushes on Justin Bieber, but it’s okay for a less-famous woman to “worship his hotness”? HL jumps all over young girls in hollywood trying to look sexy, but once it’s a young male, they encourage it? This just doesn’t make sense.
Xenu
Posted at 7:10 PM on February 19, 2011
I agree that this photo is creepy. He looks prepubescent. It’s actually kind of gross.
KimmyToTheK
Posted at 3:51 PM on February 19, 2011
is that a dildo he’s holding?
gbtw
Posted at 4:04 PM on February 18, 2011
agree. creepy. he is a boy. he could pass for 8, really, in that photo. not a good post…
Kel
Posted at 3:28 PM on February 18, 2011
Agreeing with all these other posts, gross that you are calling him sexy. He does not look sexy at all, he is underage, he is a little boy!!!! You sit here and say he is sexy but when Miley was doing similar photos shoots it was horrible. Make up your mind!!! Stop saying its ok for a young man to be sexy but not a young girl. If you are no where close to his age its not even rigth to say he is sexy!!!
Kate
Posted at 10:21 PM on February 18, 2011
There’s a huge difference between being sexy and acting sexy and we all know what Miley was trying to be.
DivaQueen
Posted at 2:29 PM on February 18, 2011
This post is truly disgusting–he’s a kid! Kids are not sexy! No website should be running a picture of a half-naked child!
ehg
Posted at 12:45 PM on February 18, 2011
hey
Judy
Posted at 11:22 AM on February 18, 2011
gross! It’s not going to be “women” who are looking at this.
jen
Posted at 10:49 AM on February 18, 2011
how gross to call a 16 year old boy “sexy”. how desperate are the women writing these spots? And if my boyfriend looked like that with his shirt off ick- he looks like a starving child.
grow up ladies, he is a child. go pick on miley cyrus again.
Steph
Posted at 11:19 AM on February 18, 2011
I agree…..A 16 year old should not be considered sexy….
bondbabe
Posted at 10:47 AM on February 18, 2011
Really?!!! I agree with Jenine; it’s VERY creepy you’re viewing his caliber of “sexiness.” Ick. He’s undeniably an attractive boy, with “boy” being the operative word here, but you’re upping the disturbance factor viewing him as a sexual object. Unless you’re a pre-pubescent or teenage girl, step off the creep-a-zoid bus and wait a few years.
Jenine
Posted at 10:09 AM on February 18, 2011
Does anyone else find it disturbing that grown women are talking about the sexiness of a 16 year old boy? Let’s get some perspective here, okay?
Em
Posted at 9:48 AM on February 18, 2011
That’s not an ad. That’s a random picture from his tour photographer.
Raj
Posted at 1:35 PM on October 21, 2011
Yeah, he is a skinny pubescent teenager. First off, how is that attractive? Second off, if tween pop stars are being demonized for dressing like whores, why are they glorifying it just because this underage-looking person is male? Third off, who the devil cares if someone is topless? Get a life. :P Or a boyfriend. Or both. (and yes, someone beberite will attack me for commenting on this anyway. The difference is I’m researching underage sexualization in the media for school. Why were you here?)
PS any adult on this page here for the ‘hotness’ of a prepubescent boy… yeah you see where my train of thought is going. Get help.