Is Kim Kardashian Sending A Message To Robert Pattinson? She Looks Like A Vampire In This Sexy New Pic!

Thu, January 13, 2011 5:03pm EST by 6 Comments
Twitter.com

Twitter.com

Pale face, blood red lips, super dark hair… is she auditioning for ‘Breaking Dawn, Part 2?’

Is Kim Kardashian, 30, a Twi-Hard? She tweeted this photo of herself Jan. 13 in a swimsuit looking extremely vampire-esque. It’s a good thing Kim has been spending time with Kris Humphries, or else Kristen Stewart might have some stiff competition on her hands. We all know Kim loves younger guys, and Edward Cullen is permanently 19! It’s a perfect fit!

What do you think BFFs? Does Kim look hot, or just undead?

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

Rach

Posted at 7:27 AM on January 14, 2011  

eww…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sue anders

Posted at 7:45 PM on January 13, 2011  

Proof positive that even though she denies it – boobs are fake, evidence of hair extensions, fake tan, and crazy amounts of make-up. She is a beautiful girl WITHOUT all this… it’s too bad we as a society don’t embrace natural beauty more…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

lala

Posted at 6:40 PM on January 13, 2011  

she look fake fake fake n plastic surgery!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Arkansas

Posted at 5:41 PM on January 13, 2011  

Well if she wants a part, someone can give her a small part of one of the witnesses in Breaking Dawn.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anon

Posted at 5:36 PM on January 13, 2011  

Edward is permanently 17, not 19. Sorry, get your facts right!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ruby

Posted at 5:43 PM on January 13, 2011  

AGREED!!!! C’mon now… you cant mistake it EDWARD IS FOREVER 17!!!!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter