Jennifer Aniston Finally Beats Angelina Jolie At Something — Which Team Are You On- Jen's or Angie's?

Mon, December 13, 2010 11:00am EDT by 81 Comments

the tourist, angelina jolie, johnny depp

Jen finally catches a break in the comparison sweepstakes. Angelina’s expensive latest film, ‘The Tourist’ was a bombolino at the box office taking in $17 million versus  Jen’s inexpensively produced ‘The Bounty Hunter’  which at $21 mil looks like a big hit in comparison!

The much anticipated combo of Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp in The Tourist did not in fact make for the big box office bucks many had predicted. According to our sister site Deadline, Angie and Johnny could only eek out $17 million at the weekend office, or, to put in another way, $3.5 million less than Jen made when The Bounty Hunter opened last March!

Now while $3.5 million may not seem like such a big difference you have to take into account that Jen’s filmed opened in March, one of the slower months for box office, while Angie’s film opened during the very popular, and often lucrative, holiday season.

There’s more too. The budget for The Tourist was a pricey $100 million, not including marketing campaigns and ads, as opposed to The Bounty Hunter which was acomparatively frugal $40 million. With a total international take of just over $136 million, Jen was actually a great investment for the studio.

Angie may have got her man, but Jen could still steal Angie’s box office crown! Which actress do you like better on the big screen?

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

ANONYMOUS

Posted at 9:03 AM on December 15, 2010  

What is so funny about this whole comparison thing Angelina’s worst have been nominated for a Golden Globe award! Bet you Bonnie you and your Angie haters never thought that was going to happen!

So cold water has been thrown on your silly premise. Angelina who is already an Oscar winnner has been nominated again no such thing is ever going to happen for Jennifer Aniston. Her movies are not only bad her acting is terrible.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

siggie blue

Posted at 12:56 PM on December 15, 2010  

Angelina finds her Golden Globe Nomination for the “Tourist” as laughable As We Do…. Socialite Life. It’s been reported every where that the press at Golden Globes covering the event broke out in laughter when the nominations for Angelina/Depp and the Tourist were announced. The Hollywood Reporter, E online, The New York, Access Hollywood etc have all commented how laughable the nominations were. How does a thriller with a 20% fresh rating (i.e. one of the worst – reviewed films of the year) on rotten tomatoes get nominated for the Best Motion Picture – Comedy? The cold water has been thrown at Angelina being an Oscar winner for being a psycho means nothing to the World.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Jennifer

Posted at 12:34 AM on December 16, 2010  

siggie blue:

Where do you get your information…you are full of s@#t!!! None of those names you threw out made “laughable” comments…youre pathetic..thats ok youre as insignificant to Angie as you are to the world…goodbye Loser

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

siggie blue

Posted at 5:54 AM on December 16, 2010  

You are the loser because you worship a devil and it’s hard for you to accept facts.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Jennifer

Posted at 6:55 AM on December 19, 2010  

siggie blue wants to argue about getting facts straight while he continues to makes up lies…LOSER!!

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ANONYMOUS

Posted at 2:45 PM on December 16, 2010  

Cold water has been thrown in your faces, now the excuse is how Angelina responded to her nomination with laughter, Depp laughed too, what the film was or isn’t, they only want her at the Golden Globes for ratings its gone from trying to compare the Tourist to Jen BIG BOMBS to all those other excuses, Jolie’s haters are so transparent it ain’t funny. The truth is haters you have been blinsided by Jolie’s Golden Globe nomination and now you are besides yourself.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sara

Posted at 6:31 PM on December 17, 2010  

Jennifer Anistan fans are probably a bunch of frustrated, feeble,mousy, jealous feminists who emasculate their husbands and boy friends (if they have any) and are easily intimidated by strong, beautiful, intelligent,talented women.

Hollywood Life’s article was poorly written and completely and obviously biased toward Anistan; but then again what can you say about a homepage that has the Kardashians as a tab.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ghfjjgh

Posted at 12:56 AM on December 15, 2010  

OMG,$99,Designer luxury bags,search ” my-discount-bag.com ” on google,get Louis Vuitton,Hermes,Chanel etc.All 80% off,and free wallet promotion is now.(uggbargain.com )^_^,get best Original Boots online

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Logic

Posted at 12:51 AM on December 15, 2010  

siggie blue, I don’t know who you are but you put it so well. I agree with your logic and I think Jennifer is perfectly fine. If only the tabloids would stop the comparisons BUT (as this blog proves) connecting the two women after all this time still gets good results.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

siggie blue

Posted at 1:01 PM on December 15, 2010  

I’m just wondering what did Jen do to other people, Are people hating on her for not collecting kids? I’m sure she loves her life, and this purely vile “gossip” means absolutely nothing to her. It just rolls off her back.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Hasbeen Aniston

Posted at 11:09 PM on December 14, 2010  

LOL! Jolie is over in Europe receiving her Golden Globe nomination (because the world ADORES her), and the two ugly stepsisters, Jen HAGiston and Chelsea HAGler, are trying to think of some new way to use her name to get a little press. Life is tough when you were born with a face that looks like a horse’s a$$.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

carrie

Posted at 9:09 PM on December 14, 2010  

angelina is so beautifull to look at, plus i admire her charity work, she’s making a difference for those who need help, shes awesome for standing up to whats right…i definitely love her movies…

jennifer is plain and her skin is so worn out she has the smoker look, shes boring and shes isnt all that great to look at, plus what charities does she get involoved, besides letting men use her…shes a hollywood slore.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

siggie blue

Posted at 12:27 PM on December 15, 2010  

You wonna know what charities Jenn is involved in SHE Quietly supports Friend of EI Faro – Orphange, abused & abandoned children who would be living in the streets.
St Jude’s Research Hospital Gala – Children with cancer and catastrophic diseases, Rainn – The Rape, Abuse & Incest – National Network, Clothes off our back – The clothes off our back Foundation is an organization that host charity auctions, Jenn donated an autographed sundance vest – has supported the following charities & Americans – EB Medical Research Foundation, Feeding Americas, Bear Necessities Pediatric, Glaad, Habitat For Humanity, Lili Clair Foundation, Luke Neuhedel Foundation and Omni Peace, Project A.L.S, National Network. CAUSES SUPPORTED – Adoption Frostering Orphans, Cancer, Children, Disaster Relief, Education, Family/Parent Support, Gay/Lesbian support, Health, Homeless, Human Rights, Hunger, Mental Challenges, Peace, Poverty, Rape/Sexual Abuse, Women. You know what I love Jenni because she doesn’t go places with camera in tow to prove to the World that she is doing something. Let me give you an example in (2002) Mel Gibson was the biggest third giver, who make the passion of Christ out of his “strong beliefs as a Christian” and we all see what fake he turned out to be. Idolizing these celebrities for charity is so wrong. What about the retired lady that gives $10 each week to the church? Her percentage is higher than these holier than thou Hollywood types. This is just my opinion there is no room for fence sitters you are either on Jen’s side fighting these homewreckers or you are in bed with homewreckers hyenas. Stop hating Jenni because I think she looks too good to be 41. I have more resepct for the celebs who do QUIET Charity work without having to splash their faces every where. Personally am hoping that saint Angelina grows Angel Wings and flies off into oblivion. Jenni is a woman of dignity, adoreable, beautiful, loyal, amazing and simple.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

LittleMo

Posted at 1:56 PM on December 15, 2010  

Don’t be so quick with admiration for Angelina’s “charity work” as this is how the wealthy keep their money. It’s called a tax write-off and you would be stunned at how much of their money they rich get to keep by doing this sort of thing. If Angie and Brad truly wanted to be charitable, don’t publically give and have their picture taken while doing it so the whole world can tell them how wonderful they are. Go to the Appalachian Mountains where the people have a hard time spelling the word “school” let alone attending one, where they’re not sure what a doctor/dentist is. You say “electricity” and “running water” and the people ask you to explain what you are talking about. But if that won’t do, since Angie hates Thanksgiving so much why not go to an Indian reservation? See the movie “Thunderheart;” it was shot near/on the Pine Ridge Reservation and was based on what happened at in the early 1970s. Or go somewhere even less well known and more remote. Believe it or not, you can actually find places like that right here in the good old USA. Go where there are no cameras, where nobody knows you, and where no one will ever find out what they did and give. That’s true charity.

As for Jennifer, she was the wife who was cheated on. She doesn’t have to stop anything.

On the other hand, karma is a bitch and Brad and Angie are going to find out the hard way that what somebody does with you they will do to you – and they deserve every bit of payback they get.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 7:52 PM on December 14, 2010  

i don’t think the screen presence of these two can be compared. i like them both, but neither really has any range as of yet. angie is great at action flicks, so if you’re into that, good- plus, she’s so damn fascinating to look at, that helps. jenn is good at these stupid romcoms- again, if you’re in the mood, fine, she’s good. she’s “cute” as joan said, but she ain’t no angie in the looks department… not many are.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Tammy

Posted at 4:21 AM on December 17, 2010  

I know a lot of guys who say Angelina is not their cup of tea (heck, my lesbian SIL said she wouldn’t do her).

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

linda temitope

Posted at 7:26 PM on December 14, 2010  

love you angie

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

valerie

Posted at 6:05 PM on December 14, 2010  

Oh maybe karma has arrived on AJ’s door step or maybe people have finally seen the light. She’s been working so hard trying to convince everyone she’s not scum but she is and hopefully most people are seeing that. At least people who have morals because we now most of her loonie fans don’t.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

JennyThorn

Posted at 2:56 AM on December 15, 2010  

Apparently the 130K+ voters who voted for her as the Biggest Film Star of 2010 does not agree with you, nor does the Foreign Press.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

siggie blue

Posted at 5:09 PM on December 14, 2010  

Jenni and Angelina are totally different kinds of women who play opposite kinds of roles in Hollywood. Angelina couldn’t play Jen’s roles, she cant do comedy at all, and comedy is HARD. Much harder than squinting your eyes and pouting your lips, that’s for sure. Funny thing! Some people knocks Jen’s talent but she makes a lot of money being a bad actor, who cares how the money gets into the bank just so it gets there. Are you jeolous? In the end it’s all subjective and nobody on this forum is going home with Angelina neither Jenni. Jenni looks so sexy though she is the type one would like to bring home to mama. That is why she fits in romantic comedy, she is non threatening but Angelina is one you would sneak in at night without mama knowing it.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 8:04 PM on December 14, 2010  

lol… love the comment about sneaking angie in at night! yah, mama wouldn’t like ange. i think in all fairness though, you should give angie some credit for what she does. i don’t think she’s got a lot of range in her acting (nor jenn), but angie is very good at action flicks and i don’t think it’s as simple as one might think. she has to look pretty and do karate kicks and such, you know— it’s also a skill. but neither of them are meryl streep, nor will they EVER be even if they improve a million fold… not meryl, not sally, etc. they haven’t shown much of an ability to capture raw and real emotion.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Bratt

Posted at 4:26 PM on December 14, 2010  

If Angelina is/was international ICON as you claim then her BOX OFFICE numbers for the opening weekend would have been bigger!!!!! So nothing like a bitchy slap to all!!!!! Where are you getting your information Hasbeen salt HERE;S THE NUMBERS Domestic: $118,311,368 40.3%
+ Foreign: $175,190,850 59.7% nO SALT DIDN’T DO $300mil internationally in theatrical alone…. LMAO Again the brangeloonies and lies after lies

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

vicky

Posted at 4:01 PM on December 14, 2010  

stupid story
Hollywood life = star = in touch = national enquirer = LIARS

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 8:06 PM on December 14, 2010  

lol… this is hysterical! what is the lie in this article? lol…

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Hasbeen Aniston

Posted at 3:03 PM on December 14, 2010  

From Box office Mojo:

Salt made $118,311,368 (domestic) and $175,190,850 (foreign) for Worldwide total of: $293,502,218.

The Switch made $27,779,426 (domestic) and $19,071,726 or a total of $46,851,152 (worldwide). Every mailroom boy in Hollywood knows Switch cost at least $40 mil to make because the union fees in NY are set in stone. Add in the marketing costs and they LOST money on Hasbeen Aniston, as they do on ALL of her films. The biggest loser was Management, which made LESS THAN ONE MIL DOMESTICALLY: $934,658 (domestic) and $1,371,738 (foreign) = Worldwide: $2,306,396.

Stop trying to pass Granny Aniston off as a movie star. She USED to be a tv star. Now she’s just a lonely, bitter, BARREN old woman with sawdust in her vag*na. No man has wanted her since Brad dumped her BARREN a$$, so she and DOG-FACED Handler are perfectly matched, since no one except a black, former drug-dealing rapper would be seen publicily wiht DOG-FACED HANDLER. No white man would have either of these two dried up old prunes.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Hasbeen Aniston

Posted at 2:50 PM on December 14, 2010  

The Switch cost AT LEAST $40 mil (as does every movie shot in NY), PLUS another $20 mil for marketing. When Huvane got Aniston on Forbes’ highest paid actresses list, he claimed she was paid $8 mil for Switch. Then after it BOMBED louder than her many failed “romances,” coming in EIGHTH and beaten by BOW WOW, Huvane suddenly started claiming the film only cost $19 mil. That’s a pretty neat trick, since it would mean they shot in New York, the most expensive film city in the world, and managed to pay all other cast and crew, all union fees and shooting costs for ony $11 mil IF ANisotn was paid the $8 mil, Huvane lied and said she was. Even Woody can’t afford to shoot in NY on $20 mil budgets, adn he isn’t paying any actor $8 mil. Stop trying to spin the numbers, Bonnie. You’re a DISGRACE to women journalists everywhere (GOD, your children must be ashamed of you for being Huvane’s well-paid H@). Aniston is an international FAILURE and everyone in LA knows it. Salt earned more than $300mil internationally in theatrical alone, not to mention ancillary sales. Aiston’s
“Management” made ONE and a HALF mil, worldwide, so spare me the comparisons.

Jolie is an international ICON, Aniston is A FAILED MULTIPLE DUMPEE whom even a loser like Mayer publicly dumped in the street (it isn’t only Brad who didn’t want the whiny loser). She has to use DOG-FACED HANDLER to fight her battles because she is too much of a p*ssy to speak for herself. At nearly 50 years old, she has no backbone and is a disgrace to women everywhere.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

siggie blue

Posted at 4:49 PM on December 14, 2010  

You keep calling Jenni a failure while she is worth $150 million dollars they hire after one movie to another because she is a good actor. You call her a loser but she’s the most bankable actress out there right now her movies make the most ROI (Return on investment incase you dont know) she’s more natural, and seems more stable and human like then her. How is her romance a failure she can decide to be dating and not be attached to someone. Just look at her peaceful, happy. Why should she hurry to find a man to be in a serious relationship with? What is wrong with sampling? You hate her because John Mayer, Brad Pitt is actually on her list (and not yours – you’d like to be next to him and how!) As long as people want to compare Jen to Angelina, I would say that day to day can did pic (not opps) Jen looks radiantly glowing and Angelina looks pale, pasty which are all signs of extreme stress. I’d take Jen’s life over Angelina any day. Oooooh dont forget Angelina banged all these men & women before he wrecked Jen’s home. Ethan Hawke, Collin Farrel, Ralph Fiennes, Leonardo Dicaprio, Timothy Hutton, Mick Jagger, Johnny Lee Miller, Billy Bob Thornton, her lesbian lover Jenny Shimizu, now Brad Pitt and just imagine the horses plus plants included in this list. So how is romances for Jenni a failure just compare the two – who is the Hollywood Pump Machine between these two. As described, it sounds to be all a bout sex and attraction instead of intergrity. Beautiful I just cant imagine crawling into bed with a skeleton, her body is awful, skinny legs, boney arms, big knees, veins all over her body and even her teeth look too big for her face now, her beauty ends right at the neck. Period. Jen ranks so high in my list. Brad Pitt took Jenni direct to the alter and that was her husband so what wrong did she do. I’m glad she’s making a beautiful life for herself, without a man if you dont mind, leave her alone, just try to find yourself a man and see if you succeed. Waiting for your reports.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

JennyThorn

Posted at 3:36 AM on December 15, 2010  

@Siggie Blue Wow you either know Angelina very well to know that she slept with all these men, or you have the intelligence of a grasshopper that you actually believe all the things you read in these gossip columns.

Anyway, who cares if she did. It’s all in the past. She’s turned her life around. Even Mary Magdalene was forgiven by Christ and she was a harlot. Nobody’s perfect, and the truth is, YOU DON’T KNOW. So you really can’t judge her based on her sex life because YOU AREN’T PRIVY TO IT.

Jennifer Aniston is an okay actress, and with the exception of The Good Girl, you have to admit that she does play the same role reminiscent of her most successful role, Rachel on Friends. Angelina may not do comedy, but she does everything else, from drama (A Mighty Heart, Changeling) to action (Wanted, Salt) to crazy (Girl Interrupted –for which she won an Oscar, Gia). But then again, she just got nominated for Best Actress in a Musical/Comedy category for the Golden Globes, so she may just do comedy, too.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Hasbeen Aniston

Posted at 2:44 PM on December 14, 2010  

The Switch cost AT LEAST $40 mil (as does every movie shot in NY), PLUS another $20 mil for marketing. When Huvane got Aniston on Forbes’ highest paid actresses list, he claimed she made $8 mil for Switch. Then after it BOMBED louder than her many failed “romances,” coming in EIGHTH and beathen by BOW WOW, Huvane suddenly started claiming the film only cost $19 mil. That’s a pretty neat trick, since it would mean they shot in New York, the most expensive film city in the world, and managed to pay all other cast and crew, all union fees and shooting costs for ony $11 mil IF ANisotn was paid the $8 mil, Huvane lied and said she was. Stop trying to spin the numbers, you’re an absolute DISGRACE to women journalists everywhere (GOD, your children must be ashamed of you for being Huvane’s well-paid H@). Anisotn is an international FAILURE and everyone in LA knows it. Salt earned more than $300mil internationally in theatrical alone, not to mention ancillary sales. Aniston’s “Management” made ONE and a HALF mil, worldwide, so spare me the comoparisons. Jolie is an international ICON, Aniston is A FAILED MULTIPLE DUMPEE whom even a loser like Mayer publicly dumped in the street (it isn’t only Brad who didn’t want the whiny loser). She has to use DOG-FACED HANDLER to fight her battles because she is too much of a p*ssy to speak for herself. At nearly 50m she has no backbone and is a disgrace to women everywhere.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Jen

Posted at 2:06 PM on December 14, 2010  

I like both but in reality a Jennifer Anniston movie hasn’t bombed since Rumour Has It and if the tourist continues the way it is it is definitely going to be considered a bomb.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

hayley

Posted at 1:35 PM on December 14, 2010  

Aniston rules, she’s funny AND has showed us how talented she is in the good girl. on the other hand how long can jolie keep up the sexy spy thing? sometimes she looks downright terrible without makeup and photoshopping. she’s so completely overrated, she is NOT the best action star (that goes to milla) she’s not even that beautiful (mal from inception was the only beautiful woman i’ve seen in movies recently) and she’s not a great actress (her pretending to be a mother in changeling was disappointing and not believable, that’s why it bombed because the woman isn’t even believable as a real mom!)

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

diane

Posted at 9:31 PM on December 13, 2010  

Yes, Jen is a great investment for the studio and she’s the better actress as well. Jolie is a one trick pony, only successes in Action films, in fact only 3, first Lara Croft, MAMS and Wanted. Salt is not yet profitable given that it cost $100M to make and astronomical marketing given they had to pay huge sums for Jolie and all her nannies and security to trek to Russia, Korea, Japan etc for premieres. Look Salt will be profitable when it sells some DVD’s however Jolie is now not even dominating Action because Milla Jovavich in Res Evil just beat her butt. Res Evil took in just $3M less worldwide. $293 vs $290. and with lower budget like Jen’s movies, Milla has already made $50M in profit before selling one dvd. The media and Jolie’s loonish fans have propped this woman up undeservedly and it’s about time she was taken down a few pegs.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

david

Posted at 7:24 PM on December 13, 2010  

Okay. One actress can command $20 million per picture joining the boys club along with Tom Cruise, Will Smith, Johnny Depp.

The other earns $8 million. Sharing the level with Anne Hathaway, Katherine Heigl, and Kate Hudson.

Are we really trying to compare star status?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

ERIN

Posted at 6:39 PM on December 13, 2010  

I noticed your not mentioning Salts success or Jen’s bomb the Switch!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Anon

Posted at 2:46 PM on December 13, 2010  

salt opened ON IT’S OWN during it’s opening weekend and opened in japan, china, russia (basically everywhere lol) and it’s reviews weren’t even that great! The switch opened with a whole lotta new releases (i admit there were some pretty exciting stuff there) and the reviews for it were good-very good. Salt was the typical action, explosion type thing so it didn’t surprise that it did well, what IS good is that “the switch” competing with all that cgi-type, whatever movies held on well and made a profit. to luis OF COARSE they promoted the movie with a fake romance (it was probably studio ordered) but jolie and depp did there fair share of promotion themselves (by constantly talking about how “great” and talented the other was in interviews.) funny because to me it seems that they don’t even like each other at all lol, there’s basically ZERO chemistry between them in the movie

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

JennyThorn

Posted at 3:43 AM on December 15, 2010  

You obviously don’t like Jolie, so why did you watch her movie just so you can comment that she and Johnny had no chemistry? I’m sorry but that’s just lame. And for your info, Salt was competing with Inception, while you can’t even name the “cgi-type” of movie The Switch was supposedly competing with. Womp womp.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Luis

Posted at 2:32 PM on December 13, 2010  

It’s not time to make comparisons yet. Besides, If I remeMber correctly Jennifer Aniston and Gerard Butler did a LOT of promotion together in different countries and faked a romance. Right?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

diane

Posted at 6:04 PM on December 15, 2010  

Wrong. Butler and Aniston consistently said in interviews from the get go that they were not romantically involved.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Tammy

Posted at 3:12 AM on December 17, 2010  

Not once did they say that they were romantically involved.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Alex

Posted at 2:16 PM on December 13, 2010  

The question was not correct. Jen is not just funny, but also talented. To make a good comedy you really need a talent.
For a drama it will do a solemn face and some water for fake tear drops. :-)

If you are looking to the box office and count the money all over the world…Jen made always a profit.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Peapod

Posted at 1:40 PM on December 13, 2010  

How does the “bombing” of “The Tourist” benefit Jennifer Aniston.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

svj

Posted at 12:33 PM on December 13, 2010  

angelina is a bad actress. she thinks she can draw audiences with her “acting” but she’s proven over and over again to suck. jennifer anniston knows the best money she makes is doing rom coms so she sticks to them and brings in more money.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Guest

Posted at 11:57 AM on December 13, 2010  

Just another example of the gossip websites and media creating something out of nothing. When will the media get over this Jennifer v. Angelina thing? !

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Cindy

Posted at 1:40 PM on December 13, 2010  

SALT! SALT! SALT!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

NEXT MRS. PITT

Posted at 10:26 PM on December 14, 2010  

It seems the media never stop talking about these two women being linked with one man as if this world has not enough men to fight for!!!

If only I can steal brad pitt and hide him somewhere without being able to be traced either by angelina, jennifer and the media i guess only then the media will stop comparing Angelina Jolie with Jennifer Aniston…LOL

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,149 other followers