Sarah Palin Denies Boob Job, Asks Everyone To Stop Looking At Her Chest!

Sun, June 13, 2010 9:06am EDT by 30 Comments
Getty Images

Getty Images

Good ole’ Sarah, who notoriously spent $150,000 on clothing in just a few months, cannot BELIEVE people would judge her on her appearance!

Sarah Palin is laying to rest rumors she had boob implants and demanding the public stop obsessing over her looks! “To be judged on or to be talked about on appearance — say chest size — it makes me wear layers, it makes me have to waste time figuring out what am I going to wear so that nobody will look at an area that I don’t need them to look at,” Palin, who I have NEVER seen in anything even closely resembling layers, told Fox News host Greta Van Susteren. A simple “no comment” would’ve been sufficient.

“Drill, baby, drill” Sarah also wants you all to know that instead of talking about her figure you should go clean up the oil spill. “I think some of those folks, too, they need to perhaps grab a shovel, go down to the Gulf, volunteer to help, clean up and save a whale or something,” she so eloquently said. No word on when she would be arriving to aid with clean-up efforts was given.

Sarah finds that this current fascination over her looks is hampering people’s ability to hear what she has to say. Like this twitter post, which utilizes the same writing style my 14-year-old sister and her friends are all fond of, “Having worked/lived thru Exxon oil spill,my family&I understand Gulf residents’ fears.Our prayers r w/u.All industry efforts must b employed.” Or her favorite newspaper and/or magazine as told to Katie Couric, “All of ‘em, any of ‘em that have been in front of me over all these years.” Mine too S!

There was a bright spot in the interview for New Yorkers however, 46-year-old Sarah shot down the rumor she was buying a home in the Hamptons.

-Chris Spargo

.

Follow HollywoodLife.com on Twitter | Become a Facebook fan

.
.

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment

KJones

Posted at 10:55 PM on June 16, 2010  

As someone who is the same age as Sarah, I am just shaking my head and rolling my eyes.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Vickey

Posted at 6:14 PM on June 15, 2010  

Sarah Palin just needs to give up at trying to be a politician because obviously she doesn’t get the fact that she isn’t smart and all she has going for her is her fake boobs. If she can’t grasp that concept there is really no hope for her…not that there was any in the first place though.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Handsome

Posted at 1:34 AM on June 15, 2010  

gbtw,

I agree with your post for the most part and that is why I wanted to point out her shortcomings, lies and distortions as a politician.

However, she chooses to wear shorts a la the Runner’s World photo and, being honest, she was rather dolled up for a fitness mag. Yet, when Newsweek, who acquired the photos through means not deemed illegal, posted same pic, she played the sexist card. I am sorry but she cannot have it both ways. If she just let it go and said nothing, then nothing happens.

In this case here, she obviously dressed in a manner that was MEANT to get attention. So, credibility is intact when she goes out of her way to attract attention and then whines about it in order to rile up her base and people call her out on it.

This is a recurring pattern. In December, she tried to go “incognito” by blacking out “McCain” on her visor in Hawaii. She then whined about the “lamestream media.” In this case here and the Newsweek outrage, I’m sorry but if you want attention and get it, don’t whine later in a cynical ploy to gin up the base and possibly receive more PAC donations.

As for her political positions, she offers nothing but snark, soundbites and buzzwords. Everything she has said has been factually debunked. She refuses to ever address any media other than Fox except her appearances on Oprah, GMA and Walters and as I wrote before, those were self promotional puff pieces in which ABC had to likely agree to treat Sarah with kid goves as her ego and relationship to reality are fragile.

She is worse than Paris Hilton, the Kardashians, etc. They KNOW they are famous for being famous and are papparazzi fodder and are IN on it. Palin actually believes she has something of merit to contribute to this nation.

Can’t wait til the Sarah Palin sex tape goes viral. Lol!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

scarla

Posted at 8:03 AM on June 15, 2010  

Nice post.
Sarah Pailin has always used her sexuality to advance her cause, as is her right, so to play the ‘gender card’ in this contrived ‘self-promoting’ situation is more than disingenuous. Let her stand up for real issues that affect girls and women in 2010. Bras were burned a long time ago…they’re nothing but pretty accessories now.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

scarla

Posted at 7:05 PM on June 14, 2010  

gbtw: I sincerely believe that Sarah Pailin did exercise her right to choose when she opted to engage with the media about her boobs, plastic surgery and clothing. The correct answer if your goal wasn’t to make the news cycle would have been “No Comment”. Sorry, but I refuse to stand behind Sarah Pailin just because she wears a bra. Human rights before false women’s rights.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

jckfmsincty

Posted at 5:59 PM on June 14, 2010  

What does it matter? She remains a brainless boob.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

donna

Posted at 1:23 PM on June 14, 2010  

In respect to Sarah Palin there really isn’t much more to judge.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Handsome

Posted at 1:12 AM on June 14, 2010  

sodakhic,

Her endorsements, like many of her other endeavors, they are a for profit enterprise. Plus, primaries, where the activists and more partisan elements tend to vote in larger numbers.

In New Mexico, my state, she endorsed Susana Martinez, the Dona Ana County District Attorney. Many thought she did so because of Martinez’s record as a prosecutor. However, according to other REPUBLICANS, Martinez hired a hotshot political consultant named Jay McClusky, who has ties to Palin’s campaign aides from 2008. McClusky paid Palin $50,000 for her blessing. Palin NEVER contacted any other campaigns-Allen Weh, Pete Domenici, Jr, Janice Arnold Jones or Doug Turner.

Intellectually hollow: Here is the proof:

-Could not answer straight questions from Couric or Gibson. “What do you read?” became ambush journalism and gotcha

-Lied about cost of ethics complaints. They were nowhere NEAR millions. The cost was $296,000; 63% or $187,797 attributed to Palin’s “complaint against herself” in Troopergate.

Nobody was paid overtime or anything more than routine salaries that would have been paid regardless of Palin being investigated or not.

Her repeated claims that AK makes 20% of gross U.S. energy: Wrong:recent estimates by Energy Information Administration show that AK’s energy production was less than 2.9 percent of total U.S. energy. Oil production was highest energy output; 14.3% in 2007, most recent year EIA has information on.

Death Panels: PolitiFact 2009 Lie of the Year

She REFUSES to ever address questions by anyone not Fox. Her appearances on Oprah, Barbara Walters, and Good Morning America were fluff and puff pieces and most likely the network had to agree with Palin’s handlers that they would not ask tough questions.

She mocks Obama for teleprompter yet had to write on her hand buzzwords she repeats AD NAUSEUM to answer a SCREENED question at a friendly forum. Before parroting line about Obama and third graders, that has been discredited.

Another example of her simple “drill baby drill” screeching being yet another misunderstanding of facts was attacking Biden last year, asking “what is so hard about drill baby drill,” ignoring the realities of the global petroleum market; without imposing export restrictions and adopting Peron like import subsitution policies or nationalization, that oil goes on same international market as Saudi and Venezuelan oil. Besides, ANWAR only has 10.4 billion recoverable barrels of oil and Alaska’s Outer Continental Shelf estimates of 27 billion barrels would, once extracted, only provide energy for a 3-4 year period, based on the CIA factbook regarding U.S oil consumption of 19.5 million per day.

Now, back to this issue. I doubt she got implants. But, wearing a tight white t-shirt with a dark bra, most likely a push-up bra is simply either ignorance or was meant to get the media buzzing, allowing her to again play victim and blast the “lamestream media.” If she truly desires privacy and wishes to be left alone with her family in peace, here are some suggestions:

-Go work at a think tank or advisory group or one of the ex presidents’ initiatives. Mostly low profile work; may actually learn something and do something.

-Stop selling endorsements and speeches like Blago sells Senate seats. Anyone who can utilize Google, YouTube or Hulu can get her speeches; they’re all pretty much the same collection of soundbites, buzzwords and snark she has spewed since Fall 2008, with some local flavor or events tossed in based on who she is pandering to that moment.

-If she hates the media so much, stop accepting the media’s money e.g. Fox, which is a major part of the media.

If she cannot step to, then she best step off. And, soda, unless you have some facts to counter with, I advise you to do the same.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Handsome

Posted at 2:03 PM on June 13, 2010  

This woman is the biggest fame ho to come down the pike in a long time. She cannot answer the softest softball questions from Couric or Gibson, has been caught in lies and distortions time and again (just do a cursory glance of FactCheck and PolitiFact), only offers snarky attacks and red meat soundbites rather than solutions yet expects to be taken seriously as a leader.

She instigated this situation by wearing a tight white shirt with a dark bra underneath; creating buzz and then getting to play victim again and blame the “lamestream media.” Just like when SHE posed in tight, short running shorts for Runner’s World and then the photographer sold the photos to Newsweek. A piece of advice: If she does not want people ogling her butt or her chest, stop wearing tight, revealing clothes and allowing herself to be photographed in it.

She is intellectually hollow but she is shrewd (or her handlers are): Create a stir and then go and play victim card on…dramatic pause…FOX NEWS and get base riled up and in their righteous indignation, they may donate to her PAC or buy her book or pre-order her new one.

She is a first class fraud and attention ho.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sodakhic

Posted at 3:25 PM on June 13, 2010  

Boy she had a lot of solutions, debating Congressman Paul, on Judge Napolitanos show on Saturday. She is speaking all over the country, supporting candidates for the November crunch of libs. For being as dumb as a bunch of rocks, no one is turning down her endorsements and she put to rest “boobgate” rather nicely. Typical liberal pap “intellectually hollow, but shrewd.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 3:48 PM on June 14, 2010  

can we stick to critiquing her political stands, and not make such ridiculous statements about her appearance? i saw the running shorts picture- for running shorts, those were hardly risque, and they were NOT tight! they were conservative running shorts. did you see clinton in his running shorts? MUCH MUCH more revealing (disgusting frankly), but we didn’t have to delve into his physique, did we? i don’t know about the white shirt and dark bra thing, but i’m taking it with a grain of salt after hearing your impressions of her running shorts. even if she did wear such a thing, however, it’s annoying that a woman has to hide every curve of her body and any iota of sexuality in this world b/c she’s dealing with either unevolved animalistic men that can’t see straight once a skirt comes in the room, or equally as unevolved women who are just flat out jealous and looking for any excuse to tear down a woman who can be both powerful and attractive at the same time (see also, the whole uproar over sportscaster erin on dwts who wore conservative dance outfits and was basically called a whore). i am not a fan of sarah’s. i did not and would not vote for her. but, when i criticize her, it’s going to be about her politics and her lack of knowledge, not her f’ing bra size, the color of her bra, or the length of her running shorts.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 3:59 PM on June 14, 2010  

lol… omg, i just saw the “tight white shirt” and “dark bra”… i can’t tell if the bra is dark or not b/c the photo quality is lacking, but the shirt is NOT tight! are you serious?! is she supposed to bind her f’ing chest before she goes out in public to avoid these ridiculous attacks? she has plenty of other things to attack besides her appearance, so let’s stick to that and keep our credibility, shall we?

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

kk

Posted at 10:48 AM on June 15, 2010  

thank you for taking time to write this. well said.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

rich felter

Posted at 2:00 PM on June 13, 2010  

i see bonnie, like ever other loser liberal, is terrified by sarah palin.
want to know how powerful sarah is…check the election results last tuesday. because of her efforts and endorsements, all of the candidates she backed won their primaries. wait until november bonnie. you should really be in deep depression after the elections.
oh, and bonnie, why aren’t you spending your time demanding your president do something about the oil spill???
everytime a liberal comments about sarah palin, her ratings increase and her stock goes up.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

scarla

Posted at 2:34 PM on June 13, 2010  

There’s been an astronomical tragedy in the Gulf Coast thanks to the ‘Drill Baby Drill’ anti-government regulation policies that existed during the 8-year reign of the Republican Party. How self-serving of you to come on here and comment on election votes for and due to Sarah Palin….How disgusting to use a republican induced nightmare to promote Sarah Palin’s political agenda. It’s clear how much you care about the oil spill and the people affected. NOT ONE BIT.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

rich felter

Posted at 5:35 PM on June 13, 2010  

scarla do you ever regret not finishing junior high school? let’s blame bush for everything from now until 2012 when we wave bye-bye to owebama. would that make you happy?

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

scarla

Posted at 6:18 PM on June 13, 2010  

Here’s a little grammar helper for you Rich, since your argument is completely lacking in substance and nothing but a pathetic attempt to insult.
#1. Capitalize the beginning of every sentence.
I think that’s covered in elementary school.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

rich felter

Posted at 7:14 PM on June 13, 2010  

to scarla: i’m well aware of that…but, i figured you’re not worth it, so why bother? btw, your post was loaded with errors. not so much regarding grammar…just a ton of factual errors, ie, my reply about you never making it through junior high school. let’s just blame your ignorance on bush because of… um…well, you pick something, but it’s for sure bushes’ fault. can’t wait to take out the trash in 2012.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

scarla

Posted at 1:47 PM on June 13, 2010  

Sarah Palin as an unlikely hero of women’s rights is a bit much for me gbtw. I’ll pass and I’m sure millions of other American women will too. I don’t give a damn what she does with her boobs…could be it’s a topic that she can articulate clearly….which isn’t often the case. I imagine Ms. Palin enjoys any reason to be in the limelight….so layer that Sarah with your Valentino jacket and while you’re at it, why don’t you donate your $150,000 campaign wardrobe to the Gulf Coast effort.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 3:09 PM on June 14, 2010  

i don’t get your point? are you saying that b/c you don’t like sarah’s political views, and b/c she doesn’t stand for your idea of feminism, she SHOULD have to discuss her boob size? i guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. i wish women would be a little more supportive of each other on such a basic issue- THAT WE SHOULDN’T BE JUDGED BY OUR CUP SIZE! i can and do dislike sarah on many ideological levels, but i certainly am not going to disagree with the fact that she shouldn’t have to discuss her boob size, regardless of whether she’s wearing a valentino jacket.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

scarla

Posted at 5:50 PM on June 14, 2010  

My point was that Sarah Pailin’s bra or lack thereof is of no significance. She’s no poster-child for women’s rights.
That she chose to discuss her ‘boobs’ with the media was her freely given choice. Any publicity apparently is good publicity in her line of ‘work’.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

gbtw

Posted at 6:09 PM on June 14, 2010  

well, now you’re not exactly being genuine. it’s my understanding that a liberal started a webpage or something to discuss her boobs, and that she was then asked about the topic. you are being unfair to say the least if you’re suggesting it was her free choice to discuss it. and, regardless of sarah’s positions or behavior that might affect women’s rights, women of all political leanings should be outraged that this is a topic that the media feels free to address with a politician. you should be as outraged by it as if it had been a liberal who was being asked such an inappropriate question. and, to take it even further, this is why women are so slow to advance, because we don’t support each other on such basic things. i consider it my duty to voice my disgust over the unabashed objectification of a female politician, but you do not because you don’t like this particular politician.

 
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Cadhan

Posted at 1:33 PM on June 13, 2010  

Is the C word an appropriate description of good ole Sarah?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sodakhic

Posted at 3:28 PM on June 13, 2010  

Not for Sarah, but you maybe.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

galey

Posted at 12:21 PM on June 13, 2010  

I agree with gbtw…I respect Sarah Palin and any woman should be proud to stand next to her after all she has gone through – She and her entire family have been media-bashed since she ran for office and very unfairly. She is a proud and strong woman unlike many that critcize her. Do your research before you criticize her and don’t believe everything you read or hear on NBC in particular.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

kitty

Posted at 12:13 PM on June 13, 2010  

she is incredibly harsh…cannot stand the stupid wench

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

sodakhic

Posted at 3:30 PM on June 13, 2010  

Obama: “Get in their faces, When they bring a knife, we bring a gun” That’s harsh.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

mani

Posted at 11:47 AM on June 13, 2010  

I wish I looked like Sarah. I won’t vote for her or for Obama though.

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Bigand Tawl

Posted at 11:42 AM on June 13, 2010  

Sarah Palin rocks! She is a super-sexy superstar!

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

mimi

Posted at 11:20 AM on June 13, 2010  

Of course people will judge you for your appearance….what else is there to judge? …..?

 Reply
Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,312 other followers