Rachel Bilson, Why Aren’t You Wearing Your Engagement Ring???

Tue, June 1, 2010 8:15pm EST by 9 Comments

Uh-oh! Is there trouble in paradise for Rachel and her fiancé of more than a year, Hayden Christensen?

Is this picture telling a thousand words? Rachel Bilson, who has been engaged to her Jumper co-star, Hayden Christensen, since Dec. 2008, was spotted out and about in Brentwood, Calif. May 30 without her engagement ring!

Although the two attended the Met gala as a couple May 4, they’re very rarely spotted together. Rachel, 28, attended the Cannes Film Festival in late May, while Hayden, 29, was spotted in Rio de Janeiro May 12 to promote the Lacoste cologne, Challenge.

Interestingly enough, the former OC star told People magazine May 6, “There are no (wedding) plans.” A rep for the actress added, “No dates have been set.”

Reps for both actors didn’t respond to calls for comment. VERY interesting indeed!

– Laura Schreffler

Get more on the Hot & Stylish Rachel Bilson:

  1. Rachel Bilson & Demi Moore Show Off In Cutouts On The Carpet!
  2. Rachel Bilson v. Katie Holmes: Pretty In Polka Dots In Our Latest Faceoff!!
  3. Rachel Bilson Is Still Flashing Her Engagement Ring – But When’s The Wedding?

Get the scoop from our friends at limelife.com

  1. Heidi Montag moves out to concentrate on her reality show
  2. Audrina Patridges’ teeth are too white
  3. Spencer Pratt pulled a gun on his friends
  4. Robert Pattinson and Tom Cruise Hilarious MTV Movie Award Video


Follow HollywoodLife.com on Twitter | Become a Facebook fan



Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

View Comment


Posted at 9:59 AM on June 2, 2010  

Since May 20, she no longer wears her engagement ring.
Then in 2009, there was not a day without her on his finger.
When Rachel returned from Cannes, it was not the most, only at the airport when she saw the paparrazis, she has given the finger.
. What an idiot not to notice?
The output Melrose Place was without her engagement ring so that even the day she went to a Starbucks and it has taken a fine, either.
IT WAS rings’keys she had clung to his fingers.
It really takes us for fools.
She goes to a meeting with a famous designer in the street, she does not wear it but when she goes to see her stylist official, she dares to put on 1 June.
We are not fooled.
There is a problem between her and Hayden!
Not long ago, in late May, he returned to Los Angeles without a visit to his fiancée.You call it a couple?
And not because she will swim at a pool it should not take his commitment ring.Rachel is not an angel.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 2:19 AM on June 2, 2010  

Rachel always do this for attention. Didn’t you know this?If both anot getting married then she should just leave it off always. Both agreed that no wedding is taking place this summer and haven’t been seem togther lately. well rachel put herself out there for people to see you can’t blame other for making a comments about her. If they have broken-up then Rachel can stop playing these games with people.It wrong and childless are her.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 1:46 AM on June 2, 2010  

Would you wear a ring worth tens of thousands of dollars to a pool party? I don’t always wear my engagement ring either because the solitaire sits up high and I’m kind of rough with my rings. Depends on the occasion.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 10:58 PM on June 1, 2010  

Some of you are way too invested and need to take your crazy back to Just Jared.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 10:47 PM on June 1, 2010  

This is a stupid story you have no clue about this couple so you make something up.

Glad they have chosen to ignore you and all the others who are clueless about their lives.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 11:00 PM on June 1, 2010  

What’s so stupid? Did you read? She didn’t make anything up. She wondered why she hadn’t worn it and then mentioned that Rachel’s people didn’t comment this time around.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 10:34 PM on June 1, 2010  

This whole “relationship” has been as fake as the day is long from day one. Time to retire that ring and move on. She’s never treated it like anything other than a prop anyway.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

look again

Posted at 9:03 PM on June 1, 2010  

Rachel has her ring on today, June 1st, in photos on another blog. She takes it off when she does photo shoots, and she just did one for TimeOnLine. This is not new, she has worn it on & off before. Her rep last August 2009 said she doesn’t always wear the ring. Old news.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter


Posted at 9:39 PM on June 1, 2010  

She hasn’t worn the ring for well over a week and has just decided to put it back on today. Ask her people about that Hollywood Life. I find it interesting that now her reps are deciding to be quiet when any other time they’re quite chatty.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter