There’s no denying it — Renée Zellweger, 40, and Mila Kunis, 26, both looked HOT on the red carpet this weekend… but which one do you think looked better? Renée brought back ’80s flare with a puffy-sleeved number at the Berlin Film Festival, while Mila kept it simple with a sleeveless black dress at the Writer’s Guld Awards in Los Angeles. So you tell us: which leading lady looked better in black?
Friday's cominig
Posted at 10:26 AM on February 22, 2010
Mila looks better in black obviously. I’ve seen Renee look better in other colors. Sometimes the glam just isn’t your job and it’s a lot of work and expense that you don’t want to go through. I’m thinking personally it’s because I don’t want to deal with a bunch of people thinking they have a right to judge me. Too fat, too skinny, too many lines? Whatever.
Jamie
Posted at 2:28 AM on February 22, 2010
Wow MelDanielle, that was an asshole thing to say. First of all, that comment about looking “Chinese”… racist much? As well, Renee and Mila both lead personal lives where they can choose to dress and look however they please.
You’re such a bitch.
Reesa
Posted at 6:12 PM on February 21, 2010
I think they’re BOTH TOO SKINNY. Whatever happened to women having shapes? I’m sick of this skinny-fad.
pimpzter
Posted at 9:17 AM on February 22, 2010
spoken like a true heavy
jughead
Posted at 4:27 PM on February 23, 2010
Both these women are trim, But at least Zellweger has some definition like she works out. Yumm her legs are hot. And if you rip those sleeves off her arms aren’t bad either.
Mila just took a bad picture I hope cause her head is not in proportion to her body. It looks like shes thin from not eating, she sure doesn’t look likd she works out. But then again she is pretty young yet.
Given the age difference I’ll have to take Renee.
Mila has no boobs.