Do you think Tiger’s alleged #1 mistress should pose in the buff?
Even if seeing Rachel Uchitel baring her birthday suit in Playboy doesn’t seem like a bad thing to you, it isn’t going to happen.
A source tells HollywoodLife.com that any type of feature – naked or otherwise – isn’t in the cards for VIP hostess.
“Rachel isn’t going to be in the magazine,” our insider confirms. “There was definitely interest, and she was ready to do it, but the deal fell through because she wanted too much money.”
But what about Tiger’s 12 other reported mistresses? Porn stars Joslyn Joyce and Holly Sampson already have lots of experience posing in the buff, so a shoot in the magazine wouldn’t be unheard of.
Says our source, “There are absolutely no deals for the other women to appear in Playboy. It isn’t going to happen – the magazine doesn’t want to go there.”
A rep for the magazine couldn’t be reached for comment.
Get More on Tiger Woods:
Rachel Uchitel: Posing for Playboy … But Just ‘Backside & Topside!’ What Else Is There? « Hollywood Life
Posted at 8:53 AM on May 17, 2010
[...] by posing for Playboy! TMZ reports that the 35-year-old former nightlife hostess, who previously turned down the mag, will be shooting a spread in three weeks and “won’t be baring it all — just [...]